c- cept as true Plaintiffs’ allegations con- cerning the relationships of the SAAR Network. Jd. 99222, 226. Defendants correctly argue, however, that Defendants have provided scant basis for linking these entities under the SAAR Network title. Certain of these groups may be subject to personal jurisdiction in

$475.00 06/03/2020 AU Review Reviewed order granting MTDismiss.w/ prejudice $475.00 0.3 $142.50 06/08/2020 DW Review Reviewed Court's Order Granting Defendants MTDismiss Cpunt.il w/ Prejudice $425.00- 0.5 $212,50 06/08/2020 DW Various ■Shared order w/ Client and spoke w/, re: result and plan going forward, r

ants' explanation about Mr. Epstein's clothing (which was not previously provided to us), that was not the point of our prior letters and emails to Defendants. (See, e.g., ECF 14 Ex. A.) The point of our letters and emails was that we have asked Defendants to identify which categories of documents and othe