735 F. Supp. 423, 424 n.2 (SD. Fla. 1990) (citation and internal quotations omitted). 351 See, e.g., People v. Nokes, 183 Cal. App. 3d_468, 476-78 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986) (reviewing Fourth Amendment precedent in its determination of the validity of court-ordered examinations of victims and determining precedent t

iews of the employer.” Id.4° 44 The decision of the intermediate state court in Smith v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission, 30 Cal. Rptr. 2d 395 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994), rev’d on other grounds, 913 P.2d 909 (Cal. 1996), lends no support to arguments challenging these regulations on First Amendment grounds. Ther