have probable cause or an evidentiary basis to support the allegations. See Cohen v. Corwin, 980 So. 2d 1153 at 1156 (citing Union Oil of California, Amsco Division v. Watson, 468 So. 2d 349 at 354 (stating that “where a dismissal is taken because of insufficiency of the evidence, the requirement of a favorable t

So. 3d 154, 155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Third Paragraph: Tatum Bros Real Estate & Investment Co. v. Watson, 109 So. 623 (Fla. 1926); Union Oil of Cal. Amsco Division v. Watson, 468 So. 2d 349, 353 (Fla. 3 rd DCA 1985); Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Mancusi, 632 So. 2d 1352, 1355 (Fla. 1994). Given Given as Modified