erned with the improper use of the process after it has been issued. My last point, Your Honor, is they cite a case called Scozari, and within the Scozari case it involved abuse of process involving extortion. The difference in that case and what that case turned on is Scozari, within the confines o

while the former is concerned with the improper use of the process after it has been issued. My last point, Your Honor, is they cite a case called Scozari, and within the Scozari case it involved abuse of process involving extortion. The difference in that case and what that case turned on is Scozari

.)(citing Gatto v. Publix Supermarket, Inc., 387 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)). The usual case of abuse of process involves some form of extortion. Scozari v. Barone, 546 So. 2d 750, 751(Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (citing Bothmann v. Harrington, 458 So. 2d 1163, 1169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)). That is exactly what has