2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(26), 15387-15392; Markus, H.R. (2008) Pride, prejudice, and ambivalence: toward a unified theory of race and ethnicity. American Psychologist, 63 (8), 651-70. * Prejudiced l

rd from the 21 United States Marshal Service is here as well. 22 And then David. 23 DAVID MARKUS: Yes. This is David Oscar 24 Markus, and I'm counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. 25 LEAH SAFFIAN: My name is Leah Saffian and Page 3 1 I'm counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. 2

rd from the 21 United States Marshal Service is here as well. 22 And then David. 23 DAVID MARKUS: Yes. This is David Oscar 24 Markus, and I'm counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. 25 LEAH SAFFIAN: My name is Leah Saffian and MAGNA9 LEGAL SERVICES Page 3 1 I'm counsel for G

MAXWELL: Here? 18 TODD BLANCHE: Right there. 19 GHISLAINE MAXWELL: Oh, it's okay. 20 TODD BLANCHE: And then Mr. Markus will -- 21 DAVID MARKUS: Yes. 22 TODD BLANCHE: -- initial as well. Thank 23 you. 24 And just to kind of -- before

MAXWELL: Here? 18 TODD BLANCHE: Right there. 19 GHISLAINE MAXWELL: Oh, it's okay. 20 TODD BLANCHE: And then Mr. Markus will -- 21 DAVID MARKUS: Yes. 22 TODD BLANCHE: -- initial as well. Thank 23 you. 24 And just to kind of -- before

file the others as well? I think the court should have them all. Let me know if you will include the others. Thanks, David --David Oscar Markus Markus/Moss markuslaw.com On Apr 9, 2021, at 6:25 PM, David Oscar Markus a wrote: Hi= No objection. Have a nice weekend. David. --David Oscar Markus

d Markus to comply with Local Criminal Rule 23.1 following an op-ed that he authored opining on the merits of this pending case. Dkt. No. 309. Mr. Markus is plainly a lawyer associated with the defense in this case. His formal representation has involved handling at least one pre-trial issue for Ms. M

ished yesterday in the New York Daily News, which was authored by David Markus, Esq., who represents the defendant in connection with this case. Mr. Markus's statements in the Op-Ed were in violation of Local Rule 23.1, which contains provisions relating to extrajudicial public statements by attorneys.