From: ' r To:lil Subject: RE: Follow-up Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 20:17:50 +0000 Inline-Images: image00 ljpg C] Sure — we have indicated that we are generally interested in speaking with her, but I think internally our view was that if we feel we're able to charge without doing this interview first, that it's likely a good candidate for a post-charge conversation. As a refresher, was an assistant to GM approximately 2003-07, and functionally worked for both GM and JE. JE paid her through his corporation. During her employment, she was over 18 On at least three occasions, GM instructed her to go to JE residence and she was assaulted; on two of those occasions, there were other women in the room and was instructed to engage in sexual acts with those women, one of whom was and the other doesn't remember the name of. More generally, she is also a witness to the relationship between JE and GM. She also noted that GM sometimes used the alias "Jennifer Miller." Because she was not underage, and her timeline doesn't overlap with when we think GM was chargeable, I think we didn't feel a need to interview pre-charge, but we certainly can if that changes, her attorneys are happy to schedule it if and when we would like. From: aa* Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 11:26 To: Subject: FW: Follow-up >; Can you remind me what the status is here — have we requested an interview with this witness? Thanks. From: Ten Gibbs Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 7:08 PM To: < Cc: Subject: Re: Follow-up Hi >; Colleen Mullen As we discussed last week, our client, has in her possession documents from and email correspondence with Ghislaine Maxwell. Thus far, we have received authorization to share the list of office numbers Ms. used during her employment with Ghislaine Maxwell from 2003-2007. Please see attached. Please let us know if you have any questions. Best, Teri On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 1:48 PM < > wrote: Will do, speak with you then. Thanks. EFTA00099482