To: (USANYS) < (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: <a> ) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests I take it we fully know that Jane Doe is I had a little pause on handing out the GJ subpoena, but since it's something previously disclosed to her, I can't see much of a problem disclosing it to her again. So I don't have a problem with you sending this out. Thanks for your work on this, From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 7:07 PM To: S (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: < Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests All, (USANYS) ) Please find attached a letter responding to the Touhy request for documents related to Jeffrey Epstein submitted by a victim who is a plaintiff in a civil suit against Epstein's estate. I am also attaching the documents to be produced in response to the request. Please let me know if you have any edits or concerns. If not, I plan to contact requester's counsel next week, let them know about the production, and send them the letter and the documents. I'm also attaching their request letter here. (M, M, and are signed off on the letter and gathered the documents.) Thanks, From: Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020 8:49 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: S (USANYS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests c >; (USANYS) ; (USANYS) Thanks very much for drafting this, and I think generally it looks great. My only small thought would near the end, in the penultimate paragraph, where I'd suggest replacing the first two sentences with (something like): "My understanding is that you may intend to make a formal written request pursuant to the above-described regulations. [If you choose to submit . .]" I say that only because the current language makes it sound like they were supposed to submit something in writing, or that they otherwise erred, when in fact what they actually asked for was just an explanation of the appropriate form in which to make a formal request—which they can do consistent with the regulations set forth in the letter. Does that sound alright? And of course on any of these I also entirely defer to =. thanks again, EFTA00087279