From: "Kochevar, Steven (USANYS)" )" To: '9 Cc: 1 Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 20:17:35 +0000 No, no response yet. I talked to McEnany this morning about the declaration in the Epstein FOIA case, and he said that he was very busy right now. I will ping him to make sure this doesn't drop, please feel free to follow up with him. Thanks. From: Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 2:49 PM To: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Cc: ) 44 '; Subject: FW: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Steven, Did you get a response to this by any chance? We were hoping to have the materials go out by the end of this week, and I just realized I don't think I saw anything else on this since Tuesday, though apologies if I just missed it. efl thanks, Alex. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 17:32 To: McEnany, John (USANYS) Cc: Jones, David (USANYS) .c >; Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests John, (USANYS) Per our call yesterday, please find attached an updated letter responding to the Touhy request from the Epstein victim. The Maxwell team is okay with this version of the letter. Please let me know if this is what you had in mind, or happy to discuss/change things if not. Thanks, Steven From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 10:10 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) Cc: Jones, David (USANYS). > Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests (USANYS) John, EFTA00088095

Please find attached a letter responding to a Touhy request from an Epstein victim and the documents to be produced with it. The Maxwell team has signed off on this response. We anticipate that requester's counsel understands that the government has additional documents here and may press on why more are not being released. To attempt to address that issue up front, the letter notes that documents governed by 6(e) cannot be produced. Please let us know if you have any concerns. Thanks, Steven From: McEnany, John (USANYS) Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 12:18 PM To: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < (USANYS)<1 < M> < >; Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Good by me From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) < Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 12:06 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < Cc: (USANYS) < Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests John, (USANYS) We have received another informal Touhy inquiry from an Epstein victim. Please find attached a letter to victim's counsel, outlining the Touhy process. This is basically the same letter we sent to Roberta Kaplan at the outset of the prior Touhy process. We intend to proceed along the same lines with this request as with the prior request. Please let me know if you have any edits or concerns. Thanks, Steven From: McEnany, John (USANYS) Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 6:27 PM To: Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests <2; >; Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) (USANYS) Thanks for the further info. With apologies, I now think Steven was right in the first place: if plaintiffs ask us for the does and we don't have them then I guess it does make most sense for us to simply say, we don't have them, try SDFIa and/or NDGA. SDFLa and NDGA may say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena one or the other of those districts, then we see if the subpoenaed district Touhy-refers the subpoena to Geoff as the "responsible" USA, and take it from there. So I am OK with Steven's plan for dealing with plaintiff's further requests as he outlines in his May 20 email. EFTA00088096