From: "Kochevar, Steven (USANYS)" ctl To: ' )" Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 00:11:12 +0000 Just the email below; no separate approval. Thanks. From: Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 8:10 PM To: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Subject: FW: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Hey — I imagine the answer is no, but just in an abundance of caution before I ping John, did he contact you separately to approve the letter? Or just email the below but no final approval? Thank you! From: McEnany, John (USANYS) Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2020 13:44 To: ca> Cc: Jones, David (USANYS) ; (USANYS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests (USANYS) < I>; Kochevar, Steven BTW, I probably don't need to tell you, our Touhy communications with VB are probably disclosable as Giglio info. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 5:32 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < Cc: Jones, David (USANYS) c e; ca> Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests John, (USANYS) Per our call yesterday, please find attached an updated letter responding to the Touhy request from the Epstein victim. The Maxwell team is okay with this version of the letter. Please let me know if this is what you had in mind, or happy to discuss/change things if not. Thanks, Steven From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 10:10 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) < Cc: Jones, David (USANYS) < M>; (USANYS) EFTA00068207

Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests John, Please find attached a letter responding to a Touhy request from an Epstein victim and the documents to be produced with it. The Maxwell team has signed off on this response. We anticipate that requester's counsel understands that the government has additional documents here and may press on why more are not being released. To attempt to address that issue up front, the letter notes that documents governed by 6(e) cannot be produced. Please let us know if you have any concerns. Thanks, Steven From: McEnany, John (USANYS) Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 12:18 PM To: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) (USANYS) <I >; )< Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Good by me From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 12:06 PM To: McEnany, John (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) <a; (USANYS) < ce; Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests John, We have received another informal Touhy inquiry from an Epstein victim. Please find attached a letter to victim's counsel, outlining the Touhy process. This is basically the same letter we sent to Roberta Kaplan at the outset of the prior Touhy process. We intend to proceed along the same lines with this request as with the prior request. Please let me know if you have any edits or concerns. Thanks, Steven From: McEnany, John (USANYS) Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 6:27 PM To: Cc: < >; (USANYS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests > Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) (USANYS) c= > Thanks for the further info. With apologies, I now think Steven was right in the first place: if plaintiffs ask us for the does and we don't have them then I guess it does make most sense for us to simply say, we don't have them, try SDFla and/or NDGA. SDFLa and NDGA may say, pound sand, and if plaintiffs subpoena one or the other of EFTA00068208