From: Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 2:37 PM To: Michael Bachne Cc: Subject: RE: =Attorney Proffer Michael, Thanks for getting back to us, and we could do anytime this Monday, March 16. What time that day would be good for you and Ms. l=? thank you, From: Michael Bachne Sent: Monday, March To: Subject: RE: Attorney Proffer following are dates that are bad for =I. Please let me know dates that work for oy and I will confirm on my calendar. March 12 March 18-20 March 25-30 April 7-15 From: Michael Bachne Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2020 17:31 To: Cc: Subject: Re: Attorney Proffer Mn DC on biz. Get back to u soon Michael Bachner Bachner & Weiner, PC Please excuse typographical errors. Messages sent through dictation. kimage001.jpg>I https://www.actl.com/ NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly EFTA00032219

prohibited. If you have received this communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e- mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice. On Mar 3, 2020, at 6:15 PM, wrote: Michael, Wanted to get back to you, as promised — as we indicated previously, the attorney proffers we've received from you haven't caused us to change our view of Ms. status, and I think you've generally addressed the initial and follow-up questions we've had. I think from our perspective the next step would be to have a conversation with Ms.= directly, and to cover with her the same topics that we've addressed with you. Ordinarily we would approach a discussion like that simply by going chronologically, and asking follow-up questions as appropriate along the way, but as I've mentioned to you previously, if it would be useful to proceed in a different format, or to focus (or avoid) specific topics in a first meeting, I think we would generally be amenable to that. And of course as we've also discussed, any discussion would be completely voluntary—not just the interview overall, but any specific topic or question that she wanted to pass on, or discuss with you in the moment, etc., would be totally up to her. Please let us know what you think? We're also happy to chat via phone if that would be helpful as well. t i l From: Sent: Saturday, Februa 22 2020 21:59 To: Michael Bachner < Cc: Subject: RE: Attorney Proffer Michael, Received, thank you. This information is helpful, and as with the prior attorney proffer, does not cause us to change our view of Ms. status. We will be traveling most of this upcoming week, but I hope that we will be able to follow up with you the following week to discuss possible next steps. thank you, From: Michael Bachner Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 10:45 To: Subject: RE: Attorney Proffer I , pls see attached replies to your questions. From: Michael Bachner < Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 202011:U1 EFTA00032220