From: < Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020 8:49 PM To: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Cc: McEnany, John (USANYS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Steven, (USANYS) (USANYS) Thanks very much for drafting this, and I think generally it looks great. My only small thought would near the end, in the penultimate paragraph, where I'd suggest replacing the first two sentences with (something like): "My understanding is that you may intend to make a formal written request pursuant to the above-described regulations. [If you choose to submit .. 1" I say that only because the current language makes it sound like they were supposed to submit something in writing, or that they otherwise erred, when in fact what they actually asked for was just an explanation of the appropriate form in which to make a formal request—which they can do consistent with the regulations set forth in the letter. Does that sound alright? And of course on any of these I also entirely defer to John. thanks again, Alex. From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Friday, January 03, 2020 12:55 To: Cc: McEnany, John (USANYS) ); Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests All, •>; (USANYS) (USANYS) Please find attached an initial letter to Kaplan Hecker re: the know if you have any edits or concerns. Once I have sign-off, rkaplanPkaplanhecker.com or let me know if I should use a request for information related to Epstein. Please let me I'll send to Robbie Kaplan (by mail and at different address). Alex, assuming there are not huge changes to be made here, I think the letter/email could just go out as the next contact with Robbie on this, but I leave it up to you if/how you want to separately give her notice that it's on the way. Thanks, Steven From: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2020 7:16 PM To: Cc: McEnany, John (USANYS) (USANYS) S.; Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Alex, All sounds good to me—thanks for the call and note. I'll circulate a draft of the initial letter. (USANYS) EFTA00088125