Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Will do. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On Jun 1, 2020 4:26 PM, " (USANYS)" wrote: Understood, and thanks for letting us know. Let's keep in touch both on timing and also on whether there's a way to identify and categorize what's already been produced, or if we'll need to just get all the raw data at this stage and go from there. From: Sent: tvlonday, June 01, 2020 16:23 To: (USANYS) [Contractor) < >; (USANYS) < Cc: (NY) (FBI) ( us AN vs) •: ::•; Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents (USANYS)<a>; Unfortunately, recent events and our staffing levels have conspired to put a kink in just about everything. If we can't make heads or tails of the stuff I've already produced, well do it again. They have told us that our staffing levels will be steadily increasing over the next few weeks, but I'm going to have to push back my estimate by a week or 2. Sorry about that. My next day in the office is Thursday, so I'll be able to see if I can easily identify what I already gave you and marry it to a reliable identifier. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On PM, (USANYS)" wrote: Thanks for this update — we'll take a look and circle back if any questions. Separately, to follow up on a question from the May IS email below, the list has just five devices as still pending to be transferred to us, and I think it's right that the plan is to reproduce all the 3503-027 Page 2 of 17 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00001995 EFTA00157177

materials so that we can get them in searchable format, but just wanted to confirm? Currently, we aren't able to match any of the prior productions to specific devices — so if we're able to match them up by Bates number now, that might work, but otherwise I think it makes sense for us to get everything. But let us know if any issue with that. And related to that question, are we still on track to get the full range of data in the next week or so? I don't think we've gotten any updates on that status in the past few weeks, and we're eager to be able to start reviewing. thanks again, From: Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 12:53 To: (USANYS) < (USANYS) [Contractor] Cc: (USANYS);- (USANYS) (FBI) a Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents (NY) Updated item descriptions. Just a side note, many thumb drives and SD cards will not have a serial number visible externally, but will report one through our tools. I included those electronically reported serial numbers. Any questions, let me know. FBI NY CART Coordinator Senior Examiner From: (USANYS) Sent: Friday, May 15, 20204:11 PM To: ) < Cc: (USANYS) ` Ma (USANYS) a › ; I. (NY) (FBI) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents (USANYS) [Contractor] 3503-027 Page 3 of 17 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00001996 EFTA00157178

From Sent: Thursday, May 14, 202015:54 Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents Here is The listing of all the evidence gathered in NY that I have. I added some columns to guide you to the unique numbers CART NY uses fro their evidence. The template wasn't a slam 3503-027 Page 4 of 17 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00001997 EFTA00157179

dunk over, so I did what I could to convey the information. If you are confused by anything, please let me know. In the column for approximate size, it is in GB, totaled at the bottom and converted to TB. In the materials contained column, I put what load file group the data was transferred over in (Mac, Windows, Loose Media, IDE, or Blacklight) If there is no entry in that column, that data has yet to be transferred. There are 2 Macs and a DVR you don't have as well as an iPhone and an iPad. IF the descriptions are a bit light, let me know and I'll do what I can to beef them up. I will get you the Island stuff tomorrow. FBI NY CART Coordinator Senior Examiner From: (USANYS) < Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 12:25 PM To: Cc: (USANYS) I. (NY) (FBI) < Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents (USANYS) [Contractor] (USANYS) < MI >; Respectfully, I think there are some miscommunications here — all we have asked is to receive the materials in a format such that we can view them using a system we have access to. We're not able to get web-enabled access through any FBI tool, so we asked for the materials to be transferred in a loadable format so we could put them on Relativity, which both we and the agents can access. We're required to have the files in a format that we can produce them to defense counsel. I've done that in many other cases and it hasn't previously been an issue. My understanding from= is that the best way to do it now is just for us (the U.S. Attorney's Office) to get the original files, which our vendor will process—by which I just mean converting into file formats that are loadable onto Relativity. It doesn't really have anything to do with the taint review—we have to have access to the docs in our systems for discovery purposes. And we were happy to get the materials as they were processed, but when we received the 1.1 million documents earlier this year, they were in a format that wasn't usable for the reasons described in the email I sent on March 9. Again, I understand from= that the best way forward is to just get copies of the materials in their original formats, which I understand will be segregated and designated by device. That should work for us! I was just trying to understand the approach, as well as the timeline. thanks, 3503-027 Page 5 of 17 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00001998 EFTA00157180