From: I. (NY) (FBI) < > Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 15:54 To: Cc: Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents .; Here is The listing of all the evidence gathered in NY that I have. I added some columns to guide you to the unique numbers CART NY uses fro their evidence. The template wasn't I slam dunk over, so I did what I could to convey the information. If you are confused by anything, please let me know. In the column for approximate size, it is in GB, totaled at the bottom and converted to TB. In the materials contained column, I put what load file group the data was transferred over in (Mac, Windows, Loose Media, IDE, or Blacklight) If there is no entry in that column, that data has yet to be transferred. There are 2 Macs and I DVR you don't have as well as an iPhone and an iPad. IF the descriptions are I bit light, let me know and I'll do what I can to beef them up. I will get you the Island stuff tomorrow. FBI NY CART Coordinator Senior Examiner From: Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 12:25 PM To: I. (NY) (FBI) .ce Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Respectfully, I think there are some miscommunications here — all we have asked is to receive the materials in I format such that we can view them using I system we have access to. We're not able to get web-enabled access through any FBI tool, so we asked for the materials to be transferred in I loadable format so we could put them on Relativity, which both we and the agents can access. We're required to have the files in I format that we can produce them to defense counsel. I've done that in many other cases and it hasn't previously been an issue. My understanding from is that the best way to do it now is just for us (the U.S. Attorney's Office) to get the original files, which our vendor will process —by which I just mean converting into file formats that are loadable onto Relativity. It doesn't really have anything to do with the taint review—we have to have access to the docs in our systems for discovery purposes. And we were happy to get the materials as they were processed, but when we received the 1.1 million documents earlier this year, they were in I format that wasn't usable for the reasons described in the email I sent on March 9. Again, I understand from that the best way forward is to just get copies of the materials in their original formats, which I understand will be segregated and designated by device. That should work for us! I was just trying to understand the approach, as well as the timeline. thanks, IM• EFTA00148020