I St. Plaza New York, NY 10007 From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 2:46 PM To: (CRM) Cc: C Subject: Re: SDNY case Thanks very much, M. We really appreciate your help. On Dec 16, 2020, at 11:28 AM, (CRM) > wrote: (CRM) Spoke with our litigation supervisor. It's probably fine to say OIA is unaware of any such country, so long as you're OK with the fact that we haven't surveyed every country on this, so theoretically it's a disprovable statement. Thanks again. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 10:36 AM To: (CRM) Cc: (CRM) Subject: RE: SDNY case Thanks, M. From: (CRM) Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 10:27 PM To: (USANYS) sc > Cc: (CRM) Subject: RE: SDNY case Hi, M I . I imagine the document . sent is our Jan. 2018 memo about anticipatory waivers (attached). I see the line to which you're referring — "OIA is unaware of any country that would consider a prospective extradition waiver binding in its extradition proceedings." I'll ask my supervisor, who heads our litigation group, if he's still comfortable with this sentence, but my sense is that in this case, the specific rebuttal information we have concerning the UK/France is more significant. Thanks, EFTA00086938