Okay thanks — please do let us know if at any point that changes, otherwise we'll look forward to being able to review the returns in early June. Thanks again. From: Sent: Friday, May 08, 2020 14:14 To: Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents There has been talk of us returning to normal soon, so I don't think it will effect the timeline I initially gave you. If it does, I'll let you know. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On May 8, 2020 1:58 PM, ' > wrote: Understood, thanks—it will be great to get that list on Thursday. As a refresh, the info we are looking for is in the attached spreadsheet template. On the returns themselves, do the changes you mentioned mean that the estimate of a month from now for complete transmission of the search warrant returns is no longer likely? If so could you please let us know what the current estimate would be, so we can factor that in? Thanks very much. From: Sent: Friday, May 08, 2020 13:50 To: Cc: >; Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Sony for the delay, they reduced us to 1 day a week, so things have been stretched out by a factor of 5. I will be back in the office on Thursday and will be able to get you the list then as I have to access some of our systems to do so. Also, please reach out to me at one of the numbers below so we can brain storm. Thanks. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On May 8, 2020 12:10 PM, ' > wrote: EFTA00147124

Steve, Following up on the below, I think you had said you expected to be able to get us a list of the devices seized from the search warrants at Epstein's residences in New York and the USVI, as well as from his person upon arrest, in about a month (during our conference call a month ago) — so wanted to check if we can still expect that very soon? We're waiting on that list to be able to do an updated search warrant on all of those devices. Please let us know the current timeline — and also the current timeline on producing the results from those August and September searches? I think you and =I were going to coordinate on that, and you had mentioned you expected we'd have it a couple months from our call, which would be about a month from now. Wanted to make sure we're still on track. thanks, From: Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 15:27 To: Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Ok let's plan on 11am tomorrow morning, I am trying to get an FBI line with a larger capacity but I won't know until tomorrow am. I will push it out when confirmed. Thanks From: Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 3:15 PM To: Cc: >; Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Yes, I can do anytime tomorrow, and Rozier can also join anytime tomorrow. So whenever is good on your end. Also, we can host a conference call, but only up to six lines at a time — so if FBI has larger capacity than that let us know, otherwise I'd propose we do: 1) 2) I= 3) 4) MI 5) /MI 6) /= if either of you wants to join (and if not, one of From: Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 14:13 EFTA00147125

Cc: >; > Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Are you available tomorrow for a conference call to discuss this issue? SSA FBI New York On Apr 7, 2020 1:55 PM, ' wrote: Following up on this from a month ago — I know we're living in a different world than what existed four weeks ago, but are you at all able to assist while working remotely? This has been pending for almost two months and we still don't have a very basic list of each device or item that was seized and searched, or for which of those we've received materials. We're happy to have a call if that would be useful, but as a first step the most basic thing we're looking for is the info in the template spreadsheet we sent earlier (that's also attached). thanks, From: (USANYS) Sent: Monday, March 09, 2020 12:00 To: Cc: > Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents >; Unfortunately I don't think this is very helpful to us. Did you take a look at the example spreadsheet I sent on 2/24? The excel file you sent has descriptions that don't match up to the items listed in the search warrant returns (that we sent on 2/23), and we don't have the 1B or CART numbers to be able to cross-reference. We also can't tell what you mean by "loose media" without a specific comparison to what was seized, we don't know which items you're referring to as "Windows machines," and we can't tell whether the entirety of any particular item has been transferred, or just partial. For example, it looks like we have gotten very, very few image files, which is surprising. We have also encountered some very significant problems in trying to review the more than 1 million documents we recently received: The data we've received has no way to put any emails and attachments together. So if an email says, "see the attached flight records," for example, we have no way of linking that up with the records themselves. Not only is that a big problem for us in review, it's going to be a huge problem for producing the documents to defense counsel. - The load file has no link to the native file, so when we load the data to the database, there's no way to have the native files show up in the database. Because many of the files are too large to open in the viewer, it effectively EFTA00147126

means that there are many files that are completely invisible to us. Related, the control numbers in the load file don't match up to the native files. So we have two sets of numbers and no way to match up anything—that is, even if we were to try to go hunt down every individual large file in the native files, it would be impossible. So the data that we most recently got, we need to get in a form that addresses those issues, and we likely will need to get a similar reproduction of the data we received a couple months ago. Otherwise we're sifting through more than a million documents without much rhyme or reason. I've re-attached the spreadsheet we sent last week — I think that's a good place to start in terms of our necessary record- keeping, and we need that info at the very least, as well as anything else you think would be useful. Also attaching the SW returns for reference. And again, we're happy to meet up anytime and hash all this out in person if that's useful. thanks, From: Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2020 16:36 To: Cc: >; Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Here is a listing of what I have already handed over in load files to the US Attorney's Office for taint review. Some points of clarification: There were 9 IDE hard drives found in the Manhattan apartment, they turned out to be 3 copies of 3 drives (9 drives in total) from a July 2007 search on one of his properties. I only processed 3 (as they were all copies). All the loose media from the NY apartment is included. All the Windows machines from the NY apartment are included. Only 2 Macs from NY and 1 from the Island are included. I will have to more closely coordinate with whoever is loading up Relativity with the remaining Macs as the tool they have to be processed with does not easily re-name the load files. Spreadsheet is attached. NYO CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner (office) (cell) From: Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2020 12:25 PM To: Cc: >; Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents I could do Thursday morning, but I think it would be helpful for us to get the accounting in advance of the meeting so we can figure out in advance what (if any) additional steps we need — is that possible? EFTA00147127