Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Friday, March 04, 2011 3:56 PM (USAFLS) RE: Jeffrey Epstein HI Nick. Thank you for your email. This is always the best way to get me. I am hardly ever at my desk, but always have my blackberry on me. As to your question, I will not be able to help you. We cannot comment, confirm or deny the existence of any investigation or on our intention to open or close a matter. Sorry Thanks From: [mailto: Sent: FriciAyarch 04, 2011 3:16 PM To: =.= (USAFLSil Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Dear I work for the Mail on Sunday newspaper in London, En land. The Mail on Sunday last week published an interview with about her time working for Jeffrey Epstein. We plan to publish more revelations this week. I have been led to believe that the FBI is interested in pursuing the allegations published in the Mail on Sunday - and that Epstein may have committed offences not covered by the non prosecution agreement. Can you give me any guidance as to whether my information is correct? You may contact me by email or on Regards, Nick Pryer Assistant Features Editor Mail on Sunday This e-mail and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information which may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete it from your system. Please be advised that the views and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not reflect the views and opinions of Associated Newspapers Limited or any of its subsidiary companies. We make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to check this e-mail and any attachments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which may be transferred by way of this e-mail. Use of this or any other e-mail facility signifies consent to any interception we might lawfully carry out to prevent abuse of these facilities. EFTA00206292

Associated Newspapers Ltd. Registered Office: • This e-mail and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information, which may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete it from your system. Please be advised that the views and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not reflect the views and opinions of Associated Newspapers Limited or any of its subsidiary companies. We make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to check this e-mail and any attachments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which may be transferred by way of this e-mail. Use of this or any other e-mail facility signifies consent to any interception we might lawfully carry out to prevent abuse of these facilit! ies. Associated Newspapers Ltd. Registered Office: From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 3:52 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Let me call you before you respond Fro ill Message ---- (USAFLS) March 04, 2011 03:47 PM . (USAFLS) Su: (USAFL Subject: FW: Jeffrey Epstein Here is his inquiry =— he wants me to confirm whether FBI is interested in this info. I will not. Original a---- From: [mailto: Sent: Fricl arch 04, 2011 3:16 PM To: =,=I (USAFLISI S Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Dear I work for the Mail on Sunday newspaper in London. En land. The Mail on Sunday last week published an interview with about her time working for Jeffrey Epstein. We plan to publish more revelations this week. I have been led to believe that the FBI is interested in pursuing the allegations published in the Mail on Sunday - and that Epstein may have committed offences not covered by the non prosecution agreement. Can you give me any guidance as to whether my information is correct? You may contact me by email or on Regards, EFTA00206293

Nick Pryer Assistant Features Editor Mail on Sunday This e-mail and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information which may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete it from your system. Please be advised that the views and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not reflect the views and opinions of Associated Newspapers Limited or any of its subsidiary companies. We make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to check this e-mail and any attachments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which may be transferred by way of this e-mail. Use of this or any other e-mail facility signifies consent to any interception we might lawfully carry out to prevent abuse of these facilities. Associated News a ers Ltd. Registered Office: This e-mail and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information, which may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete it from your system. Please be advised that the views and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not reflect the views and opinions of Associated Newspapers Limited or any of its subsidiary companies. We make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to check this e-mail and any attachments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which may be transferred by way of this e-mail. Use of this or any other e-mail facility signifies consent to any interception we might lawfully carry out to prevent abuse of these facilitl ies. Associated Newspapers Ltd. Registered Office: From: (USAFI-S) Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 20114:33 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: . (FBI) Subject: Highly Confidential -- Preliminary Investigation of Additional Crimes of Jeffrey Epstein and Others Importance: High As all of you know, there has been much in the press lately about revelations by regarding her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and his introduction of her to a number of highly placed world and business leaders. Ms. was one of the victims identified in our initial investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, although at the time we were only able to speak to her briefly on the telephone, and the agency and the office were unwilling to spend the funds to fly a group to Australia to interview her without an assurance that she would provide complete information. Through speaking with the press, Ms. made contact with Brad Edwards and his investigator, Fisten, who in turn, reached out to me, and I to Special Agent regarding these new allegations. (They EFTA00206294

are not allegations that we had heard from Ms. during the initial investigation.) Special Agent and I spoke briefly with Ms. on Monday to arrange with her to do a formal interview, with FBI LegAt and Australian National Police involvement, at the American embassy in Sydney. We are trying to set up that interview for Monday or Tuesday. Today, Special Agent and I met with Brad Edwards, Fisten, and one of Brad Edwards' law partners, Steve Jaffe, regarding Ms. ' allegations and other potential crimes uncovered during the course of Edwards' and Fisten's lengthy investigation of Epstein during their prosecution of several civil suits against him. I mean to provide you all with a lengthy legal memo discussing the potential charges against Epstein and the effect of the Non-Prosecution Agreement on any prosecution, but the things we learned today were of such significance, that I did not want to wait any longer. Fisten provided us with the following information regarding Ms. has reported that she was flown all over the United States and Europe to have sex with a number of prominent men and one woman. All of the trips were on Epstein's private plane and after each encounter she was paid by Epstein. Ms. also reports that the encounters were videotaped by Epstein and, at the end of each encounter, Epstein would "debrief" Ms. and take notes. These allegations are consistent with information received during our investi ation that Epstein made his millions by "getting dirt" on important people and blackmailing them. Ms. also reported that Epstein gave her Xanax to keep her emotionally malleable. The important who were listed are: Governor Bill Richardson; Prince Andrew; Alan Dershowitz (oral sex when Ms. was 16); Senator George Mitchell; (former) Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak; Les Wexner (CEO of The Limited GroupNictorias Secret); Ghislaine Maxwell. Glenn Dubin (founder of Highbridge Capital); and a Nobel Prize winning scientist from Harvard. Ms. has allegedly seen some of the videos and she may have pictures or other documentation, but we will need to get that from her. She also said that there were a lot of other that she was forced to have sex with, but she would need to see pictures to identify them. Ms. also reported that President Bill Clinton came to Epstein's house several times and received "erotic massages," although not from her, and at least one of these happened while he was still president. Some of these encounters occurred in Palm Beach, some in New Mexico, some in the U.S. Virgin Islands, and some in Europe (all at Epstein's residences or on his plane). [Please note that the newspapers say "there is no allegation that there was any sexual contact with Prince Andrew" due to the libel laws in England that don't allow the un- corroborated statements to be published, but she did report having sex with all of the above-listed men to the reporter, according to Fister.] Ms. identified at least two other girls who were prostituted by Epstein to this high-profile men. In addition to these crimes, Brad Edwards and Fisten provided a lot of information regarding their own investigation of Epstein that relate to obstruction of justice, including: Epstein's perjury during a deposition in one of the civil cases that led the court reporter to approach Edwards and say "that is the clearest case of perjury I have ever seen and I will be happy to testify about it for you;" evidence of Epstein and his probation officer falsifying records showing that Epstein was at home while Epstein was in South Beach or outside the state; and Epstein sending a lawyer to see a victim who had been subpoenaed and telling her that the government was going to take away her baby if she cooperated. And, last but certainly not least, there was a long discussion of Epstein's involvement with a modeling agency based in New York and Miami that was used as a front to bring in underage girls to service Epstein and his friends. There are a number of potential targets related to these allegations but, in short, the agency would submit fraudulent visa applications saying that the girls were here to model, but they were really brought in to prostitute — a classic human trafficking case. Epstein's partner has previously been discredited in connection with a former modeling agency he owned where he used promises of modeling contracts to sexually abuse young girls. Edwards and Fister also have been in contact with a "source" who Epstein has contacted to discuss developing a new "system" to obtain large amounts of girls. They are going to provide Wende's card to this "source" to see if EFTA00206295