From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 11:02 AM To: Nowak, Martin Cc: Joi Ito; Joscha Bach martin, you seemed want to to describe pow=r as potential energy, ie the ability to do work.. however many of the categories appear to violate the conservation=of energy law . ie the more you use your intellectual p=wer. the greater it becomes.- the use of political power ,ex a= public hanging . increases the perception of strength. etc. there seems to be a very important observer effec= - ie signaling. ( biologlical entites need signals ? ) t=e accumulation of power. sends a signal to others. =money might be considered a useful signal. it can be sen= as an exchange or accummulated for a status bump in a narrow search=space. the observer perception meanings are complex =br> topics for our conferences . I will fund . including hiring others to research. seminars. weekends etc 1 Power . what is it? what are some of its forms. , financial- physical intellectual poliitical. computational - and others. . chomsky - langauge ehu= military. gates. financial.. etc Decept=on . biology vs mathematics. biological entities FEED. therefore predator prey, look at the cost be=efit of deception , including self deception. al=o respect , how it is earned. wasted, stolen , e=en borrowed inherited, and then dignity the study of self resp=ct? 3 Money , what is it ? an agreement? a signal. similar to ATP. stor=d convened and used. created, local global chiv> 4. music, melody horizontal combi=ed with vertical . ie melody and harmony, the har=ony is extremely involved. i dont understand if computa=ion can be made so that parallel processors not only work their own =oice but can be overlayed to form a more complex pattern =/div> 5 Probabiliy - is it a f=rce like gravity. we can describe ( measure ) grav=ty , we can describe probabilities. neither do we =nderstand what they are, 6 Derivation of =he Power laws and distributions in biological systems. ( is intelligence really) just a self=organized layered probability engine. ) 7 and most interesting of all MOBJECTS . what are they, what role do they play in cognition are they th= wittgenstein like " images " , or are they are more. -they are embedded in context. they have emotional dimensions. my guess is as =he brain sits in 3d space any slicing. would render moot= the mere study of the pattern of neuron firings. how do mojects relate to "concepts. ". I think=they are transformations. a set of mobjects can be desribed as a concept. . the set of concept= as phenomenon. etc we know our sensory =rgans each act in a very narrow band. as joi said =ow are they circled. bounded constrained. fo=us and attention would be a weighting of one dimension of the Moject =or its projection EFTA_R1_01560161 EFTA02456737

please note The information contained in this=communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, mayconstitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the=addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying o= this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and m=y be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please=notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy =his communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. co=yright -all rights reserved 2 EFTA_R1_01560162 EFTA02456738