What is document EFTA00029617?

This is a July 2021 email exchange between a U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York and Stacey Richman, the attorney representing Mark Epstein (Jeffrey Epstein's brother). The emails discuss scheduling a phone call and Mark's request to participate.

Who is mentioned in this document?

The document mentions Mark Epstein (Jeffrey's brother), his attorney Stacey Richman of Richman Hill & Associates PLLC in the Bronx, and a redacted prosecutor from the U.S. Attorney's Office. Jeffrey Epstein is referenced indirectly when Mark asks for information about 'his brother's demise.'

What does this document reveal?

The document reveals that nearly two years after Jeffrey Epstein's death, his brother Mark was still seeking information from federal prosecutors about the circumstances of Jeffrey's death. However, the prosecutor indicated that providing such information was not the purpose of their scheduled call, suggesting the call related to a different matter entirely.

Why did the prosecutor want to speak with Mark Epstein?

The document doesn't specify the actual purpose of the call, only that it was NOT to provide information about Jeffrey Epstein's death. The prosecutor's reluctance to have Mark on the call and preference to speak with his attorney first suggests it may have related to an investigation or legal matter involving Mark himself.

What was Mark Epstein hoping to learn?

According to his attorney's email, Mark Epstein was 'hopeful [the prosecutor had] some information on his brother's demise- to shed further light.' This indicates that as of July 2021, Mark was still seeking additional details about the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death in August 2019.

What is document EFTA00029617?

This is a July 2021 email exchange between a U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York and Stacey Richman, the attorney representing Mark Epstein (Jeffrey Epstein's brother). The emails discuss scheduling a phone call and Mark's request to participate.

Who is mentioned in this document?

The document mentions Mark Epstein (Jeffrey's brother), his attorney Stacey Richman of Richman Hill & Associates PLLC in the Bronx, and a redacted prosecutor from the U.S. Attorney's Office. Jeffrey Epstein is referenced indirectly when Mark asks for information about 'his brother's demise.'

What does this document reveal?

The document reveals that nearly two years after Jeffrey Epstein's death, his brother Mark was still seeking information from federal prosecutors about the circumstances of Jeffrey's death. However, the prosecutor indicated that providing such information was not the purpose of their scheduled call, suggesting the call related to a different matter entirely.

Why did the prosecutor want to speak with Mark Epstein?

The document doesn't specify the actual purpose of the call, only that it was NOT to provide information about Jeffrey Epstein's death. The prosecutor's reluctance to have Mark on the call and preference to speak with his attorney first suggests it may have related to an investigation or legal matter involving Mark himself.

What was Mark Epstein hoping to learn?

According to his attorney's email, Mark Epstein was 'hopeful [the prosecutor had] some information on his brother's demise- to shed further light.' This indicates that as of July 2021, Mark was still seeking additional details about the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death in August 2019.

EFTA00029617 - EFTA00029618

This is an email exchange between a U.S. Attorney (name redacted) and attorney Stacey Richman regarding a phone call about Mark Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein's brother.

The document captures a brief email thread from July 1-2, 2021, between a prosecutor from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and Stacey Richman, who represents Mark Epstein. Mark Epstein requested to join a scheduled call, hoping the prosecutor had information about his brother Jeffrey's death. The prosecutor declined, stating that wasn't the purpose of the call and preferring to speak with the attorney first. This exchange occurred nearly two years after Jeffrey Epstein's death in August 2019.

Key Highlights

•Email from July 2021 between USAO-SDNY prosecutor and Mark Epstein's attorney Stacey Richman
•Mark Epstein sought information about 'his brother's demise' from federal prosecutors
•Prosecutor declined to have Mark Epstein on the call, indicating a different purpose for the discussion
•Provides evidence that Mark Epstein was still seeking answers about Jeffrey's death nearly two years later

Frequently Asked Questions

Books for Further Reading

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

Julie K. Brown

Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

James Patterson

Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Going on Being: Life at the Crossroads of Buddhism and Psychotherapy

Document Information

Bates Range

EFTA00029617 - EFTA00029618

Pages

Document Content

Page 1 - EFTA00029617

From: (USANYS)" To: STACEY RICHMAN <a Subject: Re: Mark Epstein Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 01:42:58 +0000 Hi Stacey. That's not the purpose of the call, and I would prefer to speak with you first. I'll give you a call tomorrow, thanks. On Jul 1, 2021, at 9:24 PM, STACEY RICHMAN wrote: Mark would like to be on the call if that is fine with you- he is hopeful you have some information on his brother's demise- to shed further light STACEY RICHMAN Law Offices of Richman Hill & Associates PLLC Bronx New York 10461 (Main) (Facsimile) ***Confidentiality Notice*** This email and any accompanying documents contains information that is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If the reader of this message is not the recipient, any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use or retention of this communication or its substance is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify the sender by return email. Thank you. From: (USANYS) c > Sent: Thursday, July 1, 20215:03 PM To: STACEY RICHMAN ‹ > Subject: Re: Mark Epstein ()k, talk to you then. On Jul 1, 2021, at 4:54 PM, STACEY RICHMAN < a> wrote: This can work- my cell is probably optimal that is STACEY RICHMAN Law Offices of EFTA00029617

Page 2 - EFTA00029618

Richman Hill & Associates PLLC Bronx, New York 10461 (Main) (Facsimile) ***Confidentiality Notice*** This email and any accompanying documents contains information that is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is legally privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If the reader of this message is not the recipient, any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use or retention of this communication or its substance is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify the sender by return email. Thank you. From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, July 1, 20214:46 PM To: STACEY RICHMAN Subject: RE: Mark Epstein Thanks for the quick response. Should we say 11:30? What's the best number to call? From: STACEY RICHMAN Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 4:45 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Mark Epstein Yes I have a 10 am court appearance —so before or after Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 4:44 PM To: Subject: Mark Epstein Hi Stacey, Hope this finds you well. Are you available tomorrow morning for a call? Thanks very much, Chief, Public Corruption Unit U.S. Attorney's Office Southern District of New York Desk Cell EFTA00029618