Document EFTA00029031 appears to be a series of email exchanges regarding an SDNY investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein.
The emails discuss the process of obtaining approval from the U.S. Department of Justice (U.S. Dept.) for a response to the investigation. They also reference a witness, an Enational, who has made a statement to the Met Police about alleged past abuse by Jeffrey Epstein. The document reveals that the senders have not interviewed the witness themselves and lack details about the alleged abuse.

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

The Weekly Reset Ritual : ADHD Edition: Clear Mental Clutter. Reset Routines. Recharge Your Week.
From: )" ctl To: ,CRM)" Cc: ' Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:49:31 +0000 Thanks For some reason we're required to attach an approval email to our package of paperwork, so if it's okay with you I send you a separate email about that so that I can submit the response to EOUSA. Thanks! From: (CRM) Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 1:45 PM To: Cc: Subject: Re: SDNY investigation > You can just say I have approved for OIA. U.SIDe artment ofJustice Attaché - London US Mobile: On Sep 30, 2020, at 6:42 PM, ) < wrote: Is there a counterpoint at OIA in Washington we should be emailing for OIA approval, or should we send you an email requesting approval? Thanks, From CRM) Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 202011:18 AM To: I < > Cc: Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Is she OK with the Met Police knowing about her speaking with us? From: Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 4:17 PM To: McNeil, John (CRM) Cc: Subject: RE: SDNY investigation EFTA00029031
We have not seen the statement she has given, and we do not know the names of the police officers involved. Thanks, From CRM) Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 11:16 AM To: Cc: Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Thanks. Very helpful. Am I correct in assuming that you have not seen the statement she gave to the police? Also, do you have the names of the Met officers involved? From: Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 3:53 PM To CRM) Cc: Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Thank you. We have not interviewed this witness, so we have not confirmed the details about where the abuse happened, who the perpetrator was, or how old she was when it happened. What we do know is (1) she is currently in (2) she is a Enational, and (3) according to her lawyer, she recently made a statement to the Met Police reporting some sort of past abuse by Jeffrey Epstein (and not necessarily the full scope of the information she may have in connection with our investigation), so we would be open to the possibility of sharing her name with the Met Police if, in your view, that was necessary. We are preparing travel paperwork on our end, and will try to get this moving quickly. Thanks so much for your guidance on this. Best, From CRM) Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 7:07 AM To: Subject: RE: SDNY investigation >; One other question. If there is anything that would implicate UK government interests in this witness (other than any connection with witness PA) - if she was assaulted in connection with a UK gov't function, or was a UK gov't employee, etc. - that would also be helpful to know. From: CRM) Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 11:05 AM To: ) <->; Subject: RE: SDNY investigation EFTA00029032
In speaking with LEGAT colleagues about how to do this without disclosing the witness identity, they said the UK will want to know if the conduct is also a UK crime. So a few questions: is the victim a UK national; did the alleged conduct occur on UK soil; if the conduct occurred elsewhere, was the perp a UK national and the victim under age (I think it has to be under age 16)? Also, what country is the victim currently in - England/Wales; Scotland, or N. Ireland (they each have their own procedures)? Did the victim ever report the conduct to UK law enforcement? Thx, From London) Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 6:40 PM To: Cc: c:M > Subject: Re: SDNY investigation My apologies. I haven't been able to get back on the line. John T. McNeil U.S. Dept. of Justice Attaché - London UK Mobile: Sent from a mobile device CRM) From: Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 6:09:57 PM To: McNeil, John T (London) .: >; McNeil, John (CRM)<1 Cc: <M ) Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Hi John, Thanks again for taking the time to talk to us today. We can use this conference line: passcoda From London) < > September 28, 2020 11:58 AM CRM) Subject: Re: SONY investigation uch of the day tomorrow, so how about 1:30 pm EDT or later? Thx U.S. Dept. of Justice Attaché - London UK Mobile: EFTA00029033
Sent from a mobile device From: CRM) Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 8:14:17 PM To London) Subject: FW: SDNY investigation From: Sent: Frida Se tember 25, 2020 8:14:13 PM (UTC+00:00) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London To: CRM Cc: (USANYS) Subject: Re: SDNY investigation Thanks very much. Is there a time on Tuesday that works best for you? Sent from my iFhone On Sep 25, 2020, at 1:49 PM CRM) > wrote: Hi - I will be out of the office on Monday, but could do it any other day of the week. If Monday is a critical day, I could do a call on Monday evening BST - which would be mid-afternoon your time. Let me know what works. Thx, v.b. ueparcmenc or Justice nrracn United States Embassy - London U.K. Mobile: From: Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 3:16 PM To: CRM) Cc: I 4 >; (USANYS) Subject: SDNY investigation Hi ■ I hope you're doing well. Are you possibly available for a brief call on Monday? Thanks very much, EFTA00029034
Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York New York, NY 10007 EFTA00029035



