An internal February 2020 email discussing how public comments about Prince Andrew caused concerns among potential witnesses connected to the Maxwell/Epstein investigation, while also noting progress in arranging interviews with former employees.
This is an internal prosecutorial communication from February 10, 2020, forwarded within what appears to be the Southern District of New York investigation team. The email reveals that public comments about Prince Andrew made by 'Geoff' on January 27, 2020 prompted concerns from multiple witnesses and their legal counsel about confidentiality. Notably, the document mentions that several individuals who worked for Maxwell/Epstein—who had never been interviewed before—expressed willingness to cooperate, with an interview already scheduled for February 28. It also references an Epstein employee/assistant covered by the controversial 2008 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement who had previously declined interviews but whose counsel was now open to providing an attorney proffer.
From: " MIE> To: ' Subject: Fwd: Prince Andrew Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 23:37:41 +0000 email: Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Date: February 10 2020 at 6:20:54 PM EST To:" Cc: ' Subject: Prince Andrew — Per your request: Following Geoff's comments about Prince Andrew on January 27, the team heard from counsel for several witnesses who had seen Geoff's remarks and had concerns. Specifically, following the comments about Prince Andrew, the team heard from counsel for each of whom sought to confirm that their own communications with the team about their clients would remain confidential. and-- both of whom are believed to have worked in some capacity for Maxwell/Epstein during relevant time periods — have never been interviewed before but have expressed a willingness to come in, and the team has been working with their counsel to arrange for interviews (we have an interview on the calendar with for February 28). who also was an employee/assistant of Epstein's, who was ostensibly covered by the Florida NPA, and whose name has come up with some frequency during the investigation, had previously declined to be interviewed, but more recently her counsel has expressed a willingness to provide an attorney proffer as a first step toward a possible voluntary interview. EFTA00028001



