Who is mentioned in this document?

Key individuals and entities mentioned include Jeffrey Epstein, the Attorney General's Office, and individuals with the last names Moyne, DiPiero, Parvin, and Moyer. Law firms AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER and FELD ALP are also noted.

What does this document reveal?

The document reveals a discussion among legal professionals about the appropriateness and legality of sharing subpoena information and produced documents with the U.S.V.I. AG, who is investigating Jeffrey Epstein's estate. It highlights concerns about potentially revealing investigative strategies and legal arguments.

Who is mentioned in this document?

Key individuals and entities mentioned include Jeffrey Epstein, the Attorney General's Office, and individuals with the last names Moyne, DiPiero, Parvin, and Moyer. Law firms AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER and FELD ALP are also noted.

What does this document reveal?

The document reveals a discussion among legal professionals about the appropriateness and legality of sharing subpoena information and produced documents with the U.S.V.I. AG, who is investigating Jeffrey Epstein's estate. It highlights concerns about potentially revealing investigative strategies and legal arguments.

EFTA00027708 - EFTA00027709

Document EFTA00027708 is an email thread from August 2020 regarding a subpoena issued by the Attorney General's Office of the U.S. Virgin Islands (U.S.V.I. AG) related to Jeffrey Epstein's accounts.

The email exchange discusses whether to comply with a request from the U.S.V.I. AG for copies of subpoenas and related productions that Deutsche Bank received concerning Jeffrey Epstein. Attorneys debate the legal basis for potentially withholding the subpoena itself, while generally agreeing to provide the documents already produced in response to the subpoena. The U.S.V.I. AG's investigation is described as essentially trying to copy the original investigation.

Key Highlights

•Discussion of a subpoena from the Attorney General's Office of the U.S. Virgin Islands to Deutsche Bank regarding Jeffrey Epstein's accounts.
•Consideration of whether to disclose the subpoena and related documents to the U.S.V.I. AG.
•Mention of potential legal arguments for withholding the subpoena based on non-disclosure provisions.
•Jeffrey Epstein and his estate are central to the investigation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Books for Further Reading

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

Julie K. Brown

Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

James Patterson

Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein

Bradley J. Edwards

Victims' attorney's firsthand account

Document Information

Bates Range

EFTA00027708 - EFTA00027709

Pages

Document Content

Page 1 - EFTA00027708

From: " To: SUNNI. Cc: "I >, Subject: RE: Epstein accounts Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:33:15 +0000 Thanks, will do. From: Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2020 14:57 To: / <I Cc: ) Subject: RE: Epstein accounts I >; I would recommend we push back on them producing the subpoena itself. I don't know if we listed a statute in our subpoena that would trigger the mandatory non-disclosure provision USVI was able to rely on, but if we listed money laundering that would get us there. As for the documents we received pursuant to subpoena, I don't really see a basis to push back on that, but let me know if you disagree. From: Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 2:31 PM To: (USANYS) < Cc: Subject: Re: Epstein accounts < Refreshing this — please let us know? Or happy to discuss if necessary. Thanks. On Aug 3, 2020, at 18:56, wrote: FYI, below — the AG's office at USVI is basically just trying to copy our investigation. Do we care if DB provides our subpoenas, what they produced to us, to USVI AG? From: Moyne, Parvin • Sent: Monday, August 03, 2020 12:12 To: Cc: DiPiero, Joseph NO=IIMIIIMI=1 Moyer, Thomas ) Subject: RE: Epstein accounts I hope you are well and getting some time "off" this summer. I'm reaching out via email as it may be the most efficient way to tee-up the inquiry we have received, but we can circulate a dial-in at a convenient time for you if you'd like to discuss anything. EFTA00027708

Page 2 - EFTA00027709

Deutsche Bank has received a third-party subpoena from the Attorney General's Office of the U.S. Virgin Islands in connection with a pending civil suit they have filed against Jeffrey Epstein's estate, the executors of the estate, and others. One of the requests is for a copy of any government subpoenas received by the Bank relating to Epstein, and a copy of any productions made pursuant to the subpoenas. Do we have your permission to disclose your subpoena and our production to you to the U.S.V.I. AG? Would you prefer us to refer the office to you directly or provide you with contact information? I'm happy to send you a copy of the U.S.V.I. AG subpoena if helpful in evaluating the request. Best, Parvin Parvin Daphne Moyne AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD ALP Direct: Internal: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e- mail, and delete the original message. EFTA00027709