What is document EFTA00027167?

It's a series of emails concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's trial, specifically a request for adjournment and discussion about redacting client names from court documents to protect their confidentiality.

Who is mentioned in this document?

Key individuals mentioned include Ghislaine Maxwell, Laura A. Menninger, Nicole Simmons, Jeffrey Pagliuca, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also references Judge Nathan and lawyers from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman.

What does this document reveal?

The document reveals the legal strategies and concerns surrounding Ghislaine Maxwell's trial, particularly regarding trial scheduling and the protection of client confidentiality. It shows the process of communication between lawyers and the need to balance transparency with ethical obligations.

What is document EFTA00027167?

It's a series of emails concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's trial, specifically a request for adjournment and discussion about redacting client names from court documents to protect their confidentiality.

Who is mentioned in this document?

Key individuals mentioned include Ghislaine Maxwell, Laura A. Menninger, Nicole Simmons, Jeffrey Pagliuca, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also references Judge Nathan and lawyers from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman.

What does this document reveal?

The document reveals the legal strategies and concerns surrounding Ghislaine Maxwell's trial, particularly regarding trial scheduling and the protection of client confidentiality. It shows the process of communication between lawyers and the need to balance transparency with ethical obligations.

EFTA00027167 - EFTA00027168

Document EFTA00027167 is an email exchange regarding a request for an adjournment of Ghislaine Maxwell's trial in the case of *US v. Maxwell*. It includes a draft response and discusses the redaction of other clients' names from court documents.

The document consists of emails from April 2021 between lawyers involved in the case of *US v. Maxwell*. The emails discuss a request to adjourn the trial and the need to redact the names of other clients from a letter motion to protect confidential information. Laura Menninger from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. is a key person involved, as she is seeking the redaction. The document highlights legal and ethical considerations surrounding client confidentiality and trial scheduling.

Key Highlights

•The document pertains to Ghislaine Maxwell's case and a request to adjourn her trial.
•Ghislaine Maxwell is a notable person mentioned in the document.
•Laura Menninger, a partner at Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C., is seeking redaction of other client names to maintain confidentiality.

Frequently Asked Questions

Books for Further Reading

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

Julie K. Brown

Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

James Patterson

Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein

Bradley J. Edwards

Victims' attorney's firsthand account

Document Information

Bates Range

EFTA00027167 - EFTA00027168

Pages

Document Content

Page 1 - EFTA00027167

From: ' < To: '.=1.1116 >< I>, " SUsilYS" (USANYS)" Cc: 'MEr> SANYS" Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - [Request for 120 or 180-day Adjournment of Trial] Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:32:25 +0000 Attachments: 2021-04-22_Govtletter_re_GM_requestfor adjoumment_v3.docx Draft response attached. From: Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 12:14 PM To: (USANYS) O; (USANYS) < Cc: (USANYS) Subject: FW: US v. Maxwell - [Request for 120 or 180-day Adjournment of Trial) FYI. Our response is due at 5 today. From: Laura Menninger Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 11:22 AM To: Cc: (USANYS) 4 *; Nicole Simmons ; Jeff Pagliuca 'Bobbi Sternheim Subject: US v. Maxwell - [Request for 120 or 180-day Adjournment of Trial] Judge Nathan - Pursuant to this Court's Order of April 20, 2021 (Dkt. 221), attached please find counsel's Letter Motion for an Adjournment of the trial. Counsel for Ms. Maxwell request redaction of their other clients' names and case numbers from this Letter Motion pursuant to Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6 which prohibits lawyers from revealing confidential information related to a client even where that information is publicly available. See In Re. Anonymous, 654 N.E. 2.d. 1128 (Ind. 1995) (lawyer violated Rule 1.6 by disclosing information relating to representation of client, even though information "was readily available from public sources and not confidential in nature"); In re Bryan, 61 P.3d 641 (Kan. 2003) (lawyer violated Rule 1.6 by disclosing, in court documents, existence of defamation suit against former client); State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n v. McGee, 48 P.3d 787, 791 (Okla. 2002) (a lawyer's duty of confidentiality attaches "to all information relating to the representation, whatever its source"). Upon direction of the Court, counsel will file either the redacted or unredacted version of this letter on the public docket. Best regards, Laura Menninger Laura A. Menninger I Partner Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. EFTA00027167

Page 2 - EFTA00027168

EFTA00027168