From: To: , Christian Everdell C STERNHEIM "Laura Menninger" , Jeff Pagliuca Cc:' , ' Subject: RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 22:44:53 +0000 Attachments: L_Motion_to_Preclude_the_Introduction_of Alleged_Co- Conspirator Statementsiredacted].pdf; 1a._Ex._1_to Motion to_Preclude_the Introduction_of Alleged_Co- Conspirator Statements_[redacted].pdf; 2._Motion_to_Exclude_Evidence_Prsnt_to_Rule_404(b)_[redacted].pdf; 2a._Ex._A_to_Motion_to_Exclude_Evidence_Prsnt_to_Rule_404(b)_[redacted].pdf; 3._Motion_to_Exclude_Under_FRE_702_and_Daubertiredacted].pdf; 3b. Ex._22o_Motion_to Exclude Under FRE 702 and_Daubertiredacted].pdf; 4.5viotion to Exclude J eTccuser-3:Evidenceitaacd].pdf; 7._Motion to Exclude_Govemment Exhibit 52dredacted].pdf; 8. Motion_to Exclude_Items PurpoTtedly_Siized_During_Search_of 358_EI_Brillo_Way_ [rtTtlacted].pdr, 9._Motion_to —Suppress_Identificationiredactedi_Final.pdf; 10. Motion to Preclude_Law_Enforcement_Witnesses_from_Offering_Expert_Opinion_Te ire stimony —daeted].pdf; 13._Motion_to_Preclude_Introduction_of Govemment_Exhibits 251, 288, 294, 313 and 606dredacted].pdf; Govt_Omnibus_Opp_[redacted]_Final.pdf; 12021.10.27_Maxwell_Reply_ISO_Motns_In_Limineiredacted]_Final.pdf All, For filing purposes, attached are redacted versions of the defendant's motions and exhibits, the government's omnibus opposition, and the defendant's omnibus reply. Below are our notes on which exhibits should be sealed. Please let us know if you would like to add any redactions or if you have any questions. Defense Motions Sealed The following exhibits should be sealed • Exhibit A to Motion 4 (grand jury testimony) • Exhibit B to Motion 4 (grand jury testimony) • Exhibit 1 to Motion 7 (contact book) • Exhibit 2 to Motion 7 (deposition) • Exhibit A to Motion 8 (inventory) • Exhibit A to Motion 9 (photobook) • Exhibit to Motion 13 (various exhibits) Redactions (attached) • Motion 1 and Exhibit 1 to Motion 1 • Motion 2 and Exhibit A to Motion 2 • Motion 3 and Exhibit 2 to Motion 3 • Motion 4 • Motion 7 • Motion 8 EFTA00025062

• Motion 9 • Motion 10 • Motion 13 No redactions • We are not seeking redactions to defense opening briefs for defense motions 5, 6, 11, and 12. • We are not seeking redactions to Exhibit 1 to Motion 3 (Government expert notice) Government Opposition • We are not seeking to redact Government exhibits A and B (articles) Defense Reply Sealed The following exhibits should be sealed • Exhibit A (tax documents) • Exhibit B (302) • Exhibit C (medical report) • Exhibit D (transcript) No redactions • We are not seeking redactions to defense Exhibit E (English indictment) From: Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 6:21 PM To: Christian Everdell STERNHEIM c ); Laura Menninger < Cc: Subject: RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine >; Jeff Pagliuca ; BOBBI C Happy to jump on a call. We're almost finished with the materials we'll be sending you in a second wave, so why don't we get the first wave filed, and we'll send you the second set, and then we can get on the phone. Does that work? From: Christian Everdell < Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 6:19 PM To: STERNHEIM < IM>; Laura Menninger < < >; Cc: Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine Got it. We are filing the response now. >; Jeff Pagliuca BOBBI C I was thinking through the joint cover letter and I think there are a few more logistics we have to discuss. Can you jump on a quick call? From: Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 6:16 PM To: Christian Everdell STERNHEIM c ); Laura Menninger < BOBBI C >; Jeff Pagliuca Cc: EFTA00025063

Subject: RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine Thanks for asking —yes, that's correct. From: Christian Everdell Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 6:06 PM To: BOBBI C STERNHEIM < >; Laura Menninger < >; Jeff Pagliuca Cc: Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine Just so I am clear on sequencing, you are now waiting for us to file the redacted version of our response brief, correct? BOBBI C ; Laura Menninger < >; Jeff Pagliuca From: Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 5:49 PM To: Christian Everdell STERNHEIM Cc: Subject: RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine Thanks, Chris. We'll get this first group filed and then send you the next batch. From: Christian Everdell Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 5:42 PM To: BOBBI C STERNHEIM Menninger < >; Jeff Pagliuca Cc: >; Subject: (EXTERNAL] RE: Redactions: Government motion in limine - ; Laura The redactions are consistent with what the government had proposed before. We do not have any redactions to add to these documents. But for the record, we object to all of the government's proposed redactions. Please send me the next batch when you have them ready. Thanks, Chris From: Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 4:55 PM To: Christian Everdell >; Jeff Pagliuca ; BOBBI C STERNHEIM Cc: ; ; Laura Menninger EFTA00025064

Subject: Redactions: Government motion in limine All, Thanks for the call this afternoon, it was helpful to work through the mechanics of filing redactions this afternoon. As we discussed, we're sending you versions of the following documents, with redactions applied: (1) the Government's motion in limine, (2) the defendant's opposition, and (3) the Government's reply. Please let us know if you would like us to add any redactions to these versions, and we'll get them filed. With respect to Exhibits: • We are attaching a proposed redacted version of Government exhibit A. • Only defense exhibits E and G can be filed publicly without redactions. • All other defense exhibits to the defense opposition should be filed under seal. Best, Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 EFTA00025065