What is document EFTA00022432?

This is a partially redacted email chain between SDNY federal prosecutors and attorney Brendan F. Quigley spanning February 2020 to May 2021. The correspondence relates to an unnamed client who was interviewed by federal investigators and was potentially subject to civil subpoenas in connection with the Jeffrey Epstein case.

Who is Brendan F. Quigley?

Brendan F. Quigley is a former federal prosecutor who spent nearly seven years as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York. He is now a partner at Baker Botts law firm. In this document, he appears to be representing an individual connected to the Epstein investigation in a private capacity.

What does this document reveal about the Epstein investigation?

The document reveals that SDNY prosecutors were actively interviewing witnesses and coordinating with their attorneys well into 2021. It also shows that civil attorneys representing Epstein victims were attempting to locate and serve individuals connected to the case, and that federal prosecutors served as intermediaries to facilitate these contacts while protecting their investigative interests.

Why is so much of this document redacted?

The extensive redactions likely protect the identity of Quigley's client—who could be a witness, subject, or target of the federal investigation. The redactions also obscure the specific nature of the interview conducted and the civil litigation matter referenced, consistent with protecting ongoing investigations and privacy interests.

What is document EFTA00022432?

This is a partially redacted email chain between SDNY federal prosecutors and attorney Brendan F. Quigley spanning February 2020 to May 2021. The correspondence relates to an unnamed client who was interviewed by federal investigators and was potentially subject to civil subpoenas in connection with the Jeffrey Epstein case.

Who is Brendan F. Quigley?

Brendan F. Quigley is a former federal prosecutor who spent nearly seven years as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York. He is now a partner at Baker Botts law firm. In this document, he appears to be representing an individual connected to the Epstein investigation in a private capacity.

What does this document reveal about the Epstein investigation?

The document reveals that SDNY prosecutors were actively interviewing witnesses and coordinating with their attorneys well into 2021. It also shows that civil attorneys representing Epstein victims were attempting to locate and serve individuals connected to the case, and that federal prosecutors served as intermediaries to facilitate these contacts while protecting their investigative interests.

Why is so much of this document redacted?

The extensive redactions likely protect the identity of Quigley's client—who could be a witness, subject, or target of the federal investigation. The redactions also obscure the specific nature of the interview conducted and the civil litigation matter referenced, consistent with protecting ongoing investigations and privacy interests.

EFTA00022432 - EFTA00022434

Internal email chain between SDNY prosecutors and defense attorney Brendan F. Quigley regarding an ongoing federal investigation connected to Jeffrey Epstein, spanning from February 2020 to May 2021.

This document contains redacted email correspondence between federal prosecutors from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and Brendan F. Quigley, a former SDNY prosecutor who appears to be representing an unnamed client connected to the Epstein investigation. The emails discuss scheduling calls about 'the case,' handling requests from civil attorneys seeking to serve subpoenas or document requests on Quigley's client, and coordination between federal investigators and defense counsel. The heavily redacted nature of the document suggests it involves sensitive witness or subject information from the active federal investigation that followed Epstein's 2019 arrest and death.

Key Highlights

•Shows active coordination between SDNY prosecutors and defense counsel during the 2020-2021 Epstein investigation period
•References civil attorneys attempting to serve subpoenas in connection with Epstein-related litigation
•Mentions an interview of Quigley's client conducted by federal investigators
•Demonstrates the intersection between criminal investigation and civil litigation in Epstein-related matters

Frequently Asked Questions

Books for Further Reading

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

Julie K. Brown

Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

James Patterson

Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Undaunted

Document Information

Bates Range

EFTA00022432 - EFTA00022434

Pages

Document Content

Page 1 - EFTA00022432

From To Cc Subject: RE: SDNY investigatto Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 20:00:56 +0000 Thanks very much. If 4:30 works, I can call you then. Which number is best to reach you? From: Quigley, Brenda' Se • • To: Cc: Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Sure. I am around the rest of the afternoon today. Tomorrow is a bit rougher, but I could talk first thing (like 9) or late afternoon. Brendan F. Quigley [bio] is-tr.er From Sent: T urs a Ma 6 0 11 PM To Cc [EXTERNAL EMAIL) Hi Brendan, Hope you're doing well. Do you have time this afternoon or tomorrow for a quick call about this case? Thanks, From Sent: nn ay, June EFTA00022432

Page 2 - EFTA00022433

To: Cc: Subject: Re: SDNY investigation Appreciate the courtesy. Please do not pass on our contact info. That said, feel free to contact us if anything comes up in your investigation. Thank you. Hope you guys are all hanging in okay. Brendan F. Quigley On Jun 5, 2020, at 3:19 PM, [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Brendan, rote: An attorney for an individual who has an active civil case in connection with Epstein has reached out to us to ask if we know the current counsel for I assume that the attorney is seeking to serve a request or subpoena for documents and/or testimony, though we haven't asked specifically. I don't think we ordinarily en a e on that type of question, but given that we have been in touch with you in connection with our interview of if you'd like we can pass along your contact info, so that the attorney goes to you rather than attempting to contact or serve directly. And if not, of course no problem, and we'll just let him know that we're not able to comment one way or the other on the status of any counsel. Whatever you prefer. Thanks, and hope you're well these days. From Sent: Friday, February 07, 2020 18:36 To Cc Subject: RE: SDNY investigation Thank From: Sent: Friaay, February t, tutu b:J.3 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: SDNY investigation [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Brendan, EFTA00022433

Page 3 - EFTA00022434

As promised, attached please find a copy of the proffer agreement signed today. thanks, Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email and any attachments is intended only for the recipient[s] listed above and may be privileged and confidential. Any dissemination, copying, or use of or reliance upon such information by or to anyone other than the recipient[s] listed above is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately at the email address above and destroy any and all copies of this message. EFTA00022434