From: ' To: NY FBI)" Cc: r" Subject: RE: Epstein investigation Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:56:41 +0000 Importance: Normal Works for me if that's okay for agent(s) -- just FYI for , not sure if you guys have attended reverse proffers before? You're totally welcome to be in on it, but it will just be her lawyer, no witness statements or anything, and we basically will pitch why she would be better off comin rather than us maybe just arresting her down the line. Sorry if you already talked about this with just wanted to make clear it's definitely an invite but not an obligation if you don't want! aNIMIN> Ori inal Messa e From: Sent: Monday,July 15, 2019 13:54 To: (NY) Subject: RE: Epstein investigation Sony, forgot about both of those things. Let's say tomorrow at 3:30? From: Sent: Monda Jul 15 2019 1:53 PM Subject: RE: Epstein investigation /- I'm going to be in Florida for a witness interview on Wednesday. But tomorrow works. Original From: Sent: Monday. July 15.2019 1:51 PM To: Subject: RE: Epstein investigation FBI) I have a doctor's appointment Wednesday at 10:30 so if ifs possible to do tomorrow at 11:00 or 3:30, Wednesday at 3:30, or Thursday after 4, I could do any of those times. Or if it ends up being Wednesday at 11:00, I'll get the notes after. Ori inal Messa e From: aNIMIN> EFTA00021434

July 15 2019 13:49 Y) (Flaa Subject: FW: Epstein investigation Wednesday at 11 work for everyone? Original Message From: Michael Bachner Sent: Monday. July 15. 20 1 t) I :4' I'M To: Cc: 1 • Subject: RE: Epstein investigation Hi Tomorrow or Wednesday at 11 or 3:30. Thursday any time after 11:30 to 4. https://vvww.actl.corn/ Michael Bachner, Esq. Bachner & Associates, PC 39 Broadway, Suite 1610 CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: This E-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC Sections 2510-2521, is confidential, and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Thank you. From: [mailto Original Message Sent: Monday, July 1 To: Michael Bachne Cc: Hi Michael, Subject: Re: Epstein investigation Apologies for the delay. Would you please let us know what times would work for you andMin the next two or three days? We'll then figure out a time when we can all meet. EFTA00021435

Thank you, On Jul 11, 2019, at 10:43 PM, Michael Bachner Hello 6 o'clock is somewhat late. The client lives in Michael Bachner Bachner & Associates, PC 39 Broadway-Suite 1610 Mid Please excuse typographical errors. Messages sent through dictation. [X] https://www.actl.com/ > wrote: NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice. On Jul 11, 2019, at 9:01 PM, mailto: > wrote: Michael, Would 7116 at around 6pm work for the reverse proffer in our office at 1 St. Andrews? Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza 0007 mailto: From: Michael Bachnci Sent: Thursday,July 1 1. 2_019 1_:_6 PM To: Cc: EFTA00021436

mailto: > Subject: Re: Epstein investigation Regarding the reverse proffer, We are available next week from the 15-18. I have a 2 o'clock meeting in my office on the 16th and 17th that should last an hour. So I can meet with you on those days at 11 or 1030 in the morning if that works. Please let me know Michael Bachner Bachner & Associates, PC 39 Broadway-Suite 1610 New York, NY 10006 Please excuse typographical errors. Messages sent through dictation. <--WRD000.jpg> https://www.actl.com/ NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice. On Jul 10, 2019, at 11:20 AM, Michael Bachner wrote: Sure. Michael Bachner Bachner & Associates, PC 39 Broadway-Suite 1610 ease excuse typographical errors. Messages sent through dictation. <—WRD000.jpg> https://www.actl.com/ NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice. On Jul 10 2019, at 11:08 AM, mailto: > wrote: EFTA00021437

Mike, I think it would be useful to get a better understanding of your position—it would be helpful for us to know, for example, how much time you propose to take to evaluate matters, and whether we can provide any additional information that might be useful for that process of evaluation. That likely will affect our determination regarding the grand jury appearance, at which we would expect, were we to call to ask her a number of questions we would expect to argue to the court do not implicate a fifth amendment privilege—i.e., that she couldn't simply blanket invoke. Would it be useful to discuss via phone? thanks From: Michael Bachner Sent: Wednesda Jul 10 2019 10:25 To: Cc: Subject: Re: Epstein investigation / Dear Counsel: Jury on we hereby notify you that if called as a witness would invoke her Fifth Amendment and I need time to evaluate matters. Re ardin the subpoena to testify before the Grand I met with privilege against compelled self-incrimination. Please let me know if you will require her to invoke in person or whether this communication suffices and no appertaining will be required. Yours truly, Michael Bachner Michael Bachner Bachner & Associates, PC 39 Broadway-Suite 1610 ease excuse typographical errors. Messages sent through dictation. <—WRD026.jpg> https://www.actl.com/ NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice. On Jul 9 2019, at 11:43 AM, mailto: > wrote: EFTA00021438

Mr. Bachner, Following up on our conversation earlier this morning, we wanted to provide you with the additional information and materials we discussed. In the first instance, so that you have full contact info for the team, please feel free to reach out to any of us at any time; we're all available via email or at the following phone numbers: Additionally, attached are the non-prosecution agreement, previously publicly filed in civil proceedings in Florida, and a blank version of our standard proffer agreement, both as discussed. As we mentioned, please don't hesitate to reach out with any questions, and we look forward to setting a time to speak again after you're able to confer with than Assistant U.S. Attorney ' New York <blank proffer agreement.pdf> <Epstein NPA, dated 2007-09-24.pdf> EFTA00021439