EFTA00019575 - EFTA00019576
An email exchange between defense attorney Jeffrey S. Pop and federal prosecutors regarding a witness proffer in the SDNY investigation following Jeffrey Epstein's death.
This December 2019 email correspondence shows attorney Jeffrey S. Pop of Beverly Hills coordinating with prosecutors about a potential witness who had interactions with Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecutors indicate they do not currently believe the unnamed female client ('Ms. ___') has criminal exposure based on her interactions with Epstein, and that an initial attorney proffer about those circumstances was consistent with that view. This document reveals the post-Epstein death investigation phase where prosecutors were still gathering information from witnesses connected to Epstein.
Key Highlights
- •Federal prosecutors state they have no reason to believe the witness has criminal exposure from her Epstein interactions
- •Attorney Jeffrey S. Pop, a Beverly Hills personal injury and vaccine injury specialist, was representing a witness in the SDNY investigation
- •The email dates to December 2019, approximately 4 months after Epstein's death in August 2019, showing the continued investigation into potential co-conspirators
- •The witness's identity is redacted, but prosecutors reference 'her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein'
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Links
Books for Further Reading
Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open
Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network
Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
Document Information
Bates Range
EFTA00019575 - EFTA00019576
Pages
2
Document Content
Page 1 - EFTA00019575
From: Jeffrey Pop To: ' Cc: Magaly Jimenez <I Subject: RE: SDNY investigation, Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:44:18 +0000 lane -Images: image001.jpg I received the e-mail. I will run it by an associate for a second opinion. If I then have questions I will circle back. Otherwise I will let you know about the timing of the attorney proffer regarding the issues you have outlined. Jeff Jeffrey S. Pop, Esq. JEFFREY S. POP & ASSOCIATES Beverly Hills, California 90212-3429 fax www.poplawyer.com www.vaccineinjuryteam.com JEFFREY S. POP & ASSOCIATES A LAW CORPORATION since 3980 CONFIDENTIALITY This email is for the personal and excluswe use of the recipient(s) named above. It contains confidential information from Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates. Its contents are not only to remain absolutely confidential, but may also be subject to the attorney-client privilege or coverage under the work-product doctrine. If you have received this transmission and are not the intended recipientls) or his/her agent, please be advised that any disclosure, use, review, copying, selling, dissemination, publication, or distribution of this transmission is strictly unauthorized and prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender at the number above, return the original email by mail, and delete the email file from your computer. Postage is guaranteed. Your cooperation is appreciated. Thank you. From: ) [mailto Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 9:34 PM To: Jeffre Po Cc: Subject: RE: SDNY investigation, Jeff, Following up on our phone conversation today, I wanted to memorialize that, as discussed, we do not currently have reason to believe Ms. has criminal exposure based on what we are aware of in connection with her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, and your brief attorney proffer regarding the circumstances of those interactions are consistent with that view. In your further discussions with Ms. in advance of a further attorney proffer to address the general nature of her relationship with Mr. Epstein, as well as his employees or relevant close associates, if you have any concerns about additional possible exposure you should please feel free to be in touch with us again. As we also discussed, I believe any non-federal offenses would be well outside the relevant statute(s) of limitation, but of course if you wish to further research that issue, or consult with criminal counsel, we defer to you entirely. EFTA00019575
Page 2 - EFTA00019576
Please let us know if any other information would be useful at this stage, and hopefully we can be in touch in the coming weeks about productive next steps. thank you, Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00019576
Sponsored