Internal email exchange between journalists or media professionals discussing the legal battle over unsealing Ghislaine Maxwell's 2016 deposition in the Giuffre v. Maxwell case, with concerns about victim confidentiality.
This email dated August 1, 2020 captures real-time discussion between media professionals about the high-profile fight over unsealing documents in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The sender references ongoing disputes with David Boies (Virginia Giuffre's attorney) and notes that the Second Circuit had given Maxwell's team until the 20th to file their brief. The exchange shows awareness of redacted victim names in the documents and weighs victim confidentiality concerns against the fact that some victims had already spoken publicly about their experiences with Epstein and Maxwell.
From: .1 1" To: MM. .S" Subject: RE: Unsealing Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 17:48:17 +0000 Yeah, that's what all this week's fighting with Boies has been about. The Circuit has now given them until the 20th to brief it, I think, so we can ask Boies about this in advance, but the documents have victim names redacted, for example -- https://apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=7011492a)eposition-May-2016 That redacts name, for example. Though it wouldn't be new information that was approached by Epstein and Maxwell and interacted with them, given comments to the press previously. Ori inal Messa e From: Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 22:51 To: Subject: Unsealing I didn't realize Maxwell's deposition is being unsealed in the litigation before Judge Preska. Is that right? I saw an article suggesting that will be released in the batch of documents, but wasn't sure. is named in it, obviously, so that raises concerns about victim confidentiality. Sent from my iPhone EFTA00017066



