What is document EFTA00016152?

This is a brief procedural email from March 23, 2021, sent by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison Nathan's chambers. It confirms that both parties agreed no redactions were necessary for the Bail Reply Memorandum, which was then publicly filed.

Who is mentioned in this document?

The document mentions Ghislaine Maxwell (the defendant), Bobbi C. Sternheim (defense attorney), Laura Menninger (defense attorney), Jeff Pagliuca (defense attorney), Christian Everdell (defense attorney), and Judge Alison J. Nathan (the presiding judge).

What does this document reveal?

This document reveals little of evidentiary value—it is a standard legal communication confirming a procedural matter. It shows the defense team's coordination with the court during Maxwell's third bail application in early 2021, but contains no substantive information about the underlying criminal case.

What was the outcome of Maxwell's bail applications?

Judge Nathan denied Maxwell bail four times, including after this third application which offered a $28.5 million bond and Maxwell's offer to renounce her British and French citizenship. The court found she remained a significant flight risk due to her substantial resources and foreign ties.

What is document EFTA00016152?

This is a brief procedural email from March 23, 2021, sent by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison Nathan's chambers. It confirms that both parties agreed no redactions were necessary for the Bail Reply Memorandum, which was then publicly filed.

Who is mentioned in this document?

The document mentions Ghislaine Maxwell (the defendant), Bobbi C. Sternheim (defense attorney), Laura Menninger (defense attorney), Jeff Pagliuca (defense attorney), Christian Everdell (defense attorney), and Judge Alison J. Nathan (the presiding judge).

What does this document reveal?

This document reveals little of evidentiary value—it is a standard legal communication confirming a procedural matter. It shows the defense team's coordination with the court during Maxwell's third bail application in early 2021, but contains no substantive information about the underlying criminal case.

What was the outcome of Maxwell's bail applications?

Judge Nathan denied Maxwell bail four times, including after this third application which offered a $28.5 million bond and Maxwell's offer to renounce her British and French citizenship. The court found she remained a significant flight risk due to her substantial resources and foreign ties.

EFTA00016152

A procedural email from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison Nathan regarding the public filing of a bail reply memorandum in her criminal case.

This is a routine legal correspondence dated March 23, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The email confirms that the prosecution and defense agreed no redactions were needed for the Bail Reply Memorandum, which was then publicly filed as Docket 171. This document has minimal evidentiary significance—it is a brief procedural communication about court filings rather than substantive case evidence.

Key Highlights

•Routine procedural email confirming no redactions needed for bail memorandum
•Part of Maxwell's third bail application, which offered a $28.5 million bond package
•Addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, who denied bail four times before Maxwell's 2021 trial
•Maxwell was convicted on five felony counts in December 2021

Frequently Asked Questions

Books for Further Reading

The Spider: Inside the Tangled Web of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

Julie K. Brown

Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

James Patterson

Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Document Information

Bates Range

EFTA00016152

Pages

Document Content

Page 1 - EFTA00016152

From: BOBBI C STERNHEIM To: Nathan NYSD Chambers Cc: hristian Everdell eff Pagliuca Subject: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell 20 Cr. 330 (AIN) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 20:14:57 +0000 , Laura Menninger Good afternoon- Per the court's order (Dkt. 169), the parties have conferred and agreed that redactions to the Bail Reply Memorandum are unnecessary. The original document has been publicly filed (Dkt. 171). Bobbi BOBBI C. STERNHEIM, ESQ. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 ••Covid-19 Notice: The West 19th Street office is currently closed but we continue to work remotely. Please use entail or fax, instead of regular mail, for all correspondence during this time. We continue to work regular business hours throughout this situation. Thank you for your consideration. Our best wishes for your good health and well being. This message and any attached documents contain information from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute, or use this information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message. Thank you. EFTA00016152