Document EFTA00014881 is an email exchange regarding a subpoena served to an individual related to their past association with Jeffrey Epstein. The subpoena is connected to the case of *Melissa Selinger v. Kimera Labs, Alexander Jelinek (20-cv-24267)*, involving allegations of sex discrimination, battery, and IIED (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress).
The document consists of an email thread culminating in a message from attorney Joe Nascimento to Alison, alerting her to a subpoena received in connection to the *Selinger v. Kimera Labs* case. The lawsuit involves allegations against Alexander Jelinek and Kimera Labs, with the plaintiff attempting to link the person subpoenaed to actions related to their employment with Jeffrey Epstein. The email also mentions that a motion to quash the subpoena was initially granted, but a motion to reconsider has been filed, including factual allegations related to Epstein and the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement).
From: To: Subject: RE: Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:57:51 -4)000 Inline-Images: image001.jpg Thank you, all set here From: Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 11:57 AM To: Sub Still stamped thanks From Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 11:54 AM To: Subject: RE: Thanks, they've been added, but lastly just wanted to check whether they should be marked with our confidential stamp or not, since they've been publicly filed? From: Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 11:38 AM To: Subject: RE: Just the attachment, thanks From: Sent: e nes ay, ovem er , : M To: Subject: RE: Do you just want the attachments added, or should the email below be added too? From: Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 11:02 AM To Su ject: FW: Forte 3500. Thanks. From: Joe Nascimento Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 11:38 PM To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] EFTA00014881
Hi Alison, I wanted to alert you to a recent development. was recently served with a subpoena for a de osition in Melissa Selinger v. Kimera Labs,_, Alexander Jelinek (20-cv-24267). ex-husband s being sued by a former employee on several grounds including sex discrimination, battery and IIED. is getting dragged in because they want to connect to actions while working for Epstein. The depo was set for November 30. The Defendants filed a motion to quash (attached), which the court granted and stayed the depo. The Plaintiff has filed a motion to reconsider (attached), and the Court has ordered the Defendant to respond. The Plaintiffs have included a copy of the NPA, depo and have made numerous factual allegations related to Epstein in their motion. I'll keep you updated as I learn more. Have a Happy Thanksgiving, Joe Joseph E. Nascimento, Esq. AMSEL RABEN NASCIMENTO, PLLC Lawyer's Plaza 14th Floor AMSEL RABEN NASCIMENTO EFTA00014882

