Document EFTA00014118 is an email exchange from September 2008 regarding the State v. Jeffrey Epstein case and the potential unsealing of a non-disclosure agreement.
The document consists of a series of emails discussing how to proceed with a request from The Palm Beach Daily News to unseal a non-prosecution agreement related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The emails involve legal professionals and discuss the implications of a non-disclosure agreement and the appropriate course of action given the Florida Public Records Act. Key figures include Barry Krischer, Lanna Belohlavek, and attorneys involved in the case.
From To: Cc: ' Subject: RE: State v. Jeffrey Epstein Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:25:14 +0000 Importance: Normal (USAFLS)" Given the non-disclosure agreement, aren't we left with telling the SAO that we have agreed to not disclose so it wouldn't be proper for us to now agree that unsealing is appropriate. Ultimately, it's the SAO's call because they will get the Florida Public Records Act request and they were not a signatory to the agreement. We should also notify defense counsel so that they can take whatever actions they believe are appropriate. Wait till others have had a chance to weigh in on this issue. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:50 AM To: (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: FW: State v. Jeffrey Epstein Will it never end? Barry Krisher sent the e-mail below to Rolando this morning. How would you like to handle this issue? Assistant U.S. Attome From: (USAFLS) Sent: W tuber 17, 2008 10:48 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: FW: State v. Jeffrey Epstein From: Barry Krischer plammummilmompap Sent: Wednesda September 17, 2008 10:46 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: FW: State v. Jeffrey Epstein Please advise how you would like us to proceed. The agreement referred to is the Federal Non-Prosecution agreement sealed in the file by the judge at the time of the Epstein plea. From: Lanna Belohlavek Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:21 PM To: Barry Krischer Subject: FW: State v. Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00014118
How to proceed? Lanna From: Bryce Albu inennopemsemeneemine. Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:52 PM To: Lanna Belohlavek Cc: Martin Reeder Subject: State v. Jeffrey Epstein Ms. Belohlavek, We represent The Palm Beach Daily News. The newspaper recently discovered that a non-prosecution agreement (and an addendum thereto) was filed under seal pursuant to an agreed order entered in the above-referenced case. Because the records are sealed, we cannot assess the propriety of the decision to seal them or even whether the newspaper is interested in the information contained therein. I was hoping you would discuss with me the nature of the agreement and the basis for sealing it so that we can advise our client on whether it should pursue an order unsealing the agreement. Please call me at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, C. Bryce Albu Reeder & Reeder PA EFTA00014119


