EFTA00013302
Document EFTA00013302 appears to be an email chain regarding redactions to a bail order, likely related to a legal case in the Southern District of New York.
The email exchange discusses whether redactions are necessary for Judge Nathan's opinion and order denying bail. Christian Everdell from the defense states that no redactions are needed, and Maurene, an Assistant United States Attorney, agrees. They collaborate on a joint letter to the Court conveying their position. The email suggests a disagreement or discussion about what information should be concealed from the public.
Key Highlights
- •Discussion about redactions to a bail order
- •Involvement of Assistant United States Attorney Maurene and defense attorney Christian Everdell
- •Reference to Judge Nathan's opinion and order
Frequently Asked Questions
Books for Further Reading
Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open
Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network
The Ultimate Guide to Online Selling Mastering the Digital Marketplace & A Comprehensive Guide to Success
Document Information
Bates Range
EFTA00013302
Pages
1
Document Content
Page 1 - EFTA00013302
From: " To: Christian Everdell < , " " A S)" Cc: "Mark S. Cohen" Bobbi Stemheim ff Pagliuca a-, Laura Menninger Subject: RE: Redactions Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 16:12:04 +0000 Attachments: 2020-12-30_GMjoint_letter_re_redactions_to_bail_ordendocx Chris, We agree, thank you. Attached please find a draft joint letter to the Court conveying the parties' position. Please let me know if you have any proposed revisions to the letter. Best, Maurene Assistant United States Attorney outhern District of New York Original Message From: Christian Everdell Sent: Wednesda December 30, 2020 9:17 AM To: I ; (USANYS) Cc: Mark S. Cohen < ; Laura Menninger ject: e actions ; Bobbi Sternheim Jeff Pagliuca We have reviewed Judge Nathan's opinion and order denying bail and do not believe that any redactions are necessary. If you agree, would you be able to write the joint letter to the Court, per the judge's order? Regards, Chris Sent from my iPhone EFTA00013302
Entities Mentioned
Statistics
Pages:1
Entities:9
Avg. OCR:0.9%
Sponsored