From: '-(USANYS) [Contractor]" To: (1 .1r> ' 'USANYS) [Contractor)" Cc: )" < Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 17:02:36 +0000 Attachments: 3521-003.pdf; 3521-004.pdf the two re-stamped versions are attached. I'll call BM chambers and set a time for me to bring over the thumb drive containing the supplemental 3500 production (with the correct 3521-003 and 3521-004 included). Thanks! From (USANYS) [Contractor] Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 9:48 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials USANYS) [Contractor) Thanks so much for flagging, I just re-stamped the materials as 3521-003 and 3521-004, saved here. I've loaded the two files to the thumb drive for that contains the supplemental 3500 production and swapped out the incorrect versions. If that sounds good to go, I can bring it over to chambers later this morning. Since I'm joining this production a bit late, do these two re-stamped files need to be sent out anywhere else? Thanks! From: (USANYS) > Sent: Saturday, November 6, 2021 5:59 PM To: (USANYS) [Contractor] <J >; USANYS) [Contractor) Cc: Subject: FW: US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials The index listed this correctly as 3521-003 and 3521-004, but we produced as 3521-004 and 3521-005 (I think). When you have a chance, can you please confirm? If so, I think let's reproduce as 3521-003 an 3521-004, but let me know if you think that will be more confusing/make more work. Thanks, From: Laura Menninger Sent: Saturday, November 6, 2021 5:53 PM To: < >; (USANYS) < Cc: Jeff Pagliuca Subject: [EXTERNAL] US v. Maxwell - missing testifying witness materials Counsel — We were not provided 521-003 material. >*, EFTA00009981

Can you please confirm whether that was intentional, and if not, provide it? Thank you, Laura Laura A. Henninger I Partner Haddon, Morean & Foreman, P.C. EFTA00009982