What is document DOJ-COURT-571?

It is a legal document filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, stipulating the dismissal of a case between Jane Doe No. 2 and Jeffrey Epstein with prejudice.

Who is mentioned in this document?

The document mentions Jane Doe No. 2 as the plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein as the defendant, and several attorneys including Stuart S. Mermelstein, Adam D. Horowitz, and Robert D. Critton Jr. It also mentions the law firms GOLDBERGER & WEISS, Mermelstein & Horowitz, and CRITTON,LUTTIER & COLEMAN.

What does this document reveal?

This document reveals that Jane Doe No. 2 and Jeffrey Epstein reached a settlement, leading to the dismissal of the case. The terms include each party bearing their own attorneys' fees and costs, and the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the settlement terms.

What is document DOJ-COURT-571?

It is a legal document filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, stipulating the dismissal of a case between Jane Doe No. 2 and Jeffrey Epstein with prejudice.

Who is mentioned in this document?

The document mentions Jane Doe No. 2 as the plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein as the defendant, and several attorneys including Stuart S. Mermelstein, Adam D. Horowitz, and Robert D. Critton Jr. It also mentions the law firms GOLDBERGER & WEISS, Mermelstein & Horowitz, and CRITTON,LUTTIER & COLEMAN.

What does this document reveal?

This document reveals that Jane Doe No. 2 and Jeffrey Epstein reached a settlement, leading to the dismissal of the case. The terms include each party bearing their own attorneys' fees and costs, and the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the settlement terms.

DOJ-COURT-571

Document DOJ-COURT-571 is a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in 2010.

This legal document outlines the agreement between Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 and Defendant Jeffrey Epstein to dismiss a case with prejudice. The document specifies that each party will cover their own legal fees and costs and that the court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement. Attorneys from Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. represented Jane Doe No. 2, while attorneys from CRITTON,LUTTIER & COLEMAN represented Jeffrey Epstein.

Key Highlights

•Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice indicates a settlement was reached between Jane Doe No. 2 and Jeffrey Epstein.
•Jeffrey Epstein is named as the defendant in the case.
•Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. and CRITTON,LUTTIER & COLEMAN are the law firms representing the plaintiff and defendant, respectively.

Frequently Asked Questions

Books for Further Reading

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

Julie K. Brown

Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

James Patterson

Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein

Bradley J. Edwards

Victims' attorney's firsthand account

Document Information

Bates Range

DOJ-COURT-571

Pages

Source

DOJ First Production

Original Filename

571.pdf

Document Content

Page 1 - DOJ-COURT-571_p1

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 571 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2010

Page 2 - DOJ-COURT-571_p2

Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2 Plaintiff, V. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. --------------'' STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff, JANE DOE NO. 2 and Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (collectively, "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 41 (A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own attorneys fees and costs. The Parties further stipulate that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties' settlement. rl/, Dated this Jf7 day of June, 2010 BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMA LLP RITTON, JR., ESQ. 0. 224162 .com 303 Banyan Boulevard Respectfully submitted, MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Jane Doe No. 2 D. HOROWIT , SQ. Florida Bar No. 376 0 [email protected] 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 571 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2010