Document DOJ-COURT-549 is a legal motion filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
This document is an unopposed motion for an enlargement of time, filed by the plaintiffs (Jane Does 2-8) in a case against Jeffrey Epstein. The motion requests a two-day extension to respond to Epstein's appeal of magistrate's orders. The reason cited for the extension is the plaintiffs' counsel's involvement in other cases.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092, ____________________________________/ PLAINTIFFS JANE DOES 2-8’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S RULE 4 APPEAL OF PORTIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE’S ORDERS DATED FEBRUARY 4, 2010 (DE 480) AND APRIL 1, 2010 (DE 513) Plaintiffs, Jane Does 2-8, by and through undersigned counsel, file this Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Response to Defendant’s Rule 4 Appeal of Portions of The Magistrate’s Orders Dated February 4, 2010 (DE 480) and April 1, 2010 (DE 513), and state as follows: 1. Defendant Epstein filed his Rule 4 Appeal on May 12, 2010. Plaintiffs’ Response is presently due to be filed on May 26, 2010. 2. Plaintiffs request a brief enlargement of time of two (2) days, until and including May 28, 2010, to file their Response. 3. Plaintiffs’ counsel requires an enlargement of time due to demands on Plaintiffs’ Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 549 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2010
Page 1 of 4 counsel in this and other cases and matters, including A.G.D. et al. v. Siegel, case no. 09-CV- 80959, U.S. District Court, S.D. Fla; and Doe v. Waterford Kids Academy, Inc., case no. 09-CA- 10377, Orange County Circuit Court. 4. Plaintiffs bring this Motion in good faith and not for purposes of undue delay. 5. Pursuant to S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1(A), Plaintiffs’ counsel has conferred with counsel for Defendant regarding the relief sought in this Motion, who has advised Plaintiffs’ counsel that Defendant has no objection to the enlargement of time requested. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request an enlargement of time of two (2) days, until and including May 28, 2010, to file their Response to Defendant’s Rule 4 Appeal. Dated: May 26, 2010. Respectfully submitted, By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) [email protected] MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: (305) 931-2200 Fax: (305) 931-0877 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 549 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2010
Page 2 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on May 26, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. /s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 549 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2010
Page 3 of 4 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Bradley James Edwards [email protected] Isidro Manuel Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg [email protected] Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 549 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2010



