What is document DOJ-COURT-484?

It is a legal motion filed by Jane Doe's legal representatives asking the court to allow them to submit a 25-page response to Jeffrey Epstein's 24-page appeal pleading in case 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON.

Who is mentioned in this document?

Key individuals mentioned include Jane Doe, Jeffrey Epstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and Paul Cassell. Other legal representatives such as Robert D. Critton, Stuart S. Mermelstein, Adam D. Horowitz, Robert C. Josefsberg, Jack Patrick Hill, Katherine Warthen Ezell, Michael James Pike, and Isidro Manual Garcia are also listed. The law firm EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN is also mentioned.

What does this document reveal?

This document reveals a procedural step in a legal case involving Jane Doe and Jeffrey Epstein, specifically focusing on a dispute over the length of response pleadings. It highlights the plaintiff's need for sufficient space to address all arguments made by the defendant.

What is document DOJ-COURT-484?

It is a legal motion filed by Jane Doe's legal representatives asking the court to allow them to submit a 25-page response to Jeffrey Epstein's 24-page appeal pleading in case 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON.

Who is mentioned in this document?

Key individuals mentioned include Jane Doe, Jeffrey Epstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and Paul Cassell. Other legal representatives such as Robert D. Critton, Stuart S. Mermelstein, Adam D. Horowitz, Robert C. Josefsberg, Jack Patrick Hill, Katherine Warthen Ezell, Michael James Pike, and Isidro Manual Garcia are also listed. The law firm EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN is also mentioned.

What does this document reveal?

This document reveals a procedural step in a legal case involving Jane Doe and Jeffrey Epstein, specifically focusing on a dispute over the length of response pleadings. It highlights the plaintiff's need for sufficient space to address all arguments made by the defendant.

DOJ-COURT-484

Document DOJ-COURT-484 is a motion filed by plaintiff Jane Doe in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requesting permission to submit a 25-page response to a 24-page appeal pleading filed by Jeffrey Epstein.

This legal document pertains to Case No. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON, involving Jane Doe as the plaintiff and Jeffrey Epstein as the defendant. Filed on March 10, 2010, the motion argues that the additional page is necessary to adequately address the arguments presented by Epstein. Attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell are representing Jane Doe.

Key Highlights

•Jane Doe requests to file a 25-page response to Jeffrey Epstein's 24-page appeal pleading.
•Jeffrey Epstein is the defendant in the case.
•Paul Cassell, based in Salt Lake City, is one of the attorneys representing Jane Doe.

Frequently Asked Questions

Books for Further Reading

Perversion of Justice

Julie K. Brown

Investigative journalism that broke the case open

Filthy Rich

James Patterson

Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes

Victims in Criminal Procedure

Document Information

Bates Range

DOJ-COURT-484

Pages

Source

DOJ First Production

Original Filename

484.pdf

Document Content

Page 1 - DOJ-COURT-484_p1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. _________________________________/ Related Cases: 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 __________________________________/ PLAINTIFF JANE DOE’S MOTION TO RESPOND TO EPSTEIN’S 24-PAGE APPEAL PLEADING WITH A 25-PAGE RESPONSE Plaintiff, Jane Doe, moves to respond to a 24-page appeal pleading filed by Jeffrey Epstein with a 25-page response. Given the number of arguments raised by Epstein in his 24 pages, Jane Doe requires 25 pages to respond to make sure that all his arguments are answered. The undersigned does not believe the defendant Epstein will have objection to this motion. Therefore, Jane Doe respectfully request that this Court grant her motion and allow her to file a 25-page response. DATED: March 10, 2010 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 484 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2010

Page 2 - DOJ-COURT-484_p2

Page 1 of 3 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON 2 Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 524-2820 Facsimile (954) 524-2822 Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: [email protected] and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: [email protected] CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March 10, 2010 I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically filed Notices of Electronic Filing. s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 484 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2010

Page 3 - DOJ-COURT-484_p3

Page 2 of 3 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON 3 SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Isidro Manual Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz [email protected] Stuart S. Mermelstein [email protected] Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 484 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2010