Document DOJ-COURT-474 is a notification filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida regarding a pending motion to compel in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein.
This document, filed on February 23, 2010, notifies the court that a motion to compel responses to requests for net worth discovery, filed by Plaintiffs Jane Doe Nos. 2-8 against defendant Jeffrey Epstein, has been pending and fully briefed for ninety days. The plaintiffs, through their attorneys at MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, are seeking to move the case forward. The document lists related cases and provides contact information for the plaintiffs' attorneys.
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092, ____________________________________/ PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NOS. 2-8’S NOTIFICATION Plaintiffs Jane Doe Nos. 2-8, by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.B.3, hereby give notice that a motion in this case has been pending and fully briefed for a period of ninety (90) days, as follows: OF 90 DAYS EXPIRING ON MOTION TO COMPEL 1. On September 30, 2009, Plaintiffs Jane Doe Nos. 2-8 filed a Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Net Worth Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (D.E. 333). 2. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed his response to the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel on November 2, 2009 (D.E. 390). 3. Plaintiffs Jane Doe Nos. 2-8 filed their reply to Defendant Epstein’s response on November 23, 2009 (D.E. 426). Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 474 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2010
Page 1 of 3 2 4. No hearing has been held or scheduled on the Motion. 5. Plaintiffs calculate that the applicable ninety day period expired on February 22, 2010. 6. Plaintiffs’ counsel file this Notification for purposes of compliance with the duty of movant’s counsel set forth in S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1 B.3. Respectfully submitted, By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) [email protected] MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: (305) 931-2200 Fax: (305) 931-0877 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on February 23, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. /s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 474 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2010
Page 2 of 3 3 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Bradley James Edwards [email protected] Isidro Manuel Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg [email protected] Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 474 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2010


