UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. _________________________________/ Related Cases: 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 __________________________________/ PLAINTIFF JANE DOE’S OBJECTION TO EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPEAL AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, REQUEST FOR DIRECTION TO EPSTEIN TO BEGIN ASSEMBLING MATERIALS Plaintiff, Jane Doe, respectfully files this Objection to Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time (dkt. #464). Epstein is apparently requesting an additional 15 days from February 18, 2010, to file an objection to an order from the magistrate judge that he produce documents that were provided to him by the Government during the discovery phase of the criminal case. As the magistrate judge concluded, any purported Fifth Amendment objection to producing such documents is utterly groundless. The Fifth Amendment protects a defendant from revealing things to the Government that it does not know. The Government obviously knows what is in the documents that it gave to him. Therefore, there is no legitimate Fifth Amendment objection to such production. Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 465 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2010

Page 1 of 4 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON 2 In addition, 15 days on top of the already prescribed 10 days to appeal is an excessively long period of time. As the Court is aware, the discovery period prescribed in this case will soon draw to a close. Jane Doe needs the documents produced quickly and in a timely fashion so that she can pursue any leads revealed in them during the discovery period. In the alternative, if the Court grants any extension of time to file an appeal, Jane Doe respectfully requests that the extension order also include a direction to Epstein to fully assemble all of the required documents so that, if Epstein’s appeal is rejected, the documents can be produced to Jane Doe without any further delay. DATED: February 9, 2010 Respectfully submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 524-2820 Facsimile (954) 524-2822 Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: [email protected] and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: [email protected] Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 465 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2010

Page 2 of 4 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 9, 2010 I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically filed Notices of Electronic Filing. s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 465 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2010

Page 3 of 4 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON 4 SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Isidro Manual Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz [email protected] Stuart S. Mermelstein [email protected] Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 465 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2010