Document DOJ-COURT-443 is Jeffrey Epstein's reply to the plaintiffs' response to a motion to compel the Presidential Women's Center to comply with a subpoena and also a motion to compel the center to comply with a subpoena regarding Jane Doe No. 4.
This legal document, filed in the Southern District of Florida, pertains to the case of Jane Doe No. 2 against Jeffrey Epstein. It includes Epstein's response to the plaintiffs' response regarding a motion to compel the Presidential Women's Center to comply with a subpoena duces tecum. The document also incorporates a motion to compel the Presidential Women's Center to comply with a subpoena regarding Jane Doe No. 4.
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 443 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/29/2009
Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. I --------------- Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 I --------------- EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO MOTION TO COMPEL PRESIDENTIAL WOMEN'S CENTER TO COMPLY WITH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM AND INCORPORATED MOTION TO COMPEL PRESIDENTIAL WOMEN'S CENTER TO COMPLY WITH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM REGARDING JANE DOE NO. 4 Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), submits this reply to Plaintiffs', Jane Doe Nos. 2, 3 and 5-8 ("Plaintiffs"), Response to Epstein's Motion to Compel Presidential Women's Center to Comply with Subpoena Duces Tecum (DE #442) and also moves to compel Presidential Women's Center to Comply with Subpoena Duces Tecum Regarding Jane Doe No. 4, and states: I. On December 2, 2009, Epstein filed a Motion to Compel Presidential Women's Center to Comply with Subpoena Duces Tecum ("Motion to Compel") (DE #431). 2. Since the filing of the Motion to Compel (DE #431), Presidential Women's Center notified undersigned counsel that it does not have any records for Jane Doe Nos 2, 3, 5, 6 and 8. 1 1 Epstein did not serve a subpoena on Presidential Women's Center for Jane Doe No. 7. Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 443 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/29/2009
Page 2 of 5 3. Thus, unless circumstances change in the future, the issues in Epstein's Motion to Compel and the subpoenas to Presidential Women's Center regarding Jane Doe Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6 and 8 are moot at the current time. MOTION TO COMPEL PRESIDENTIAL WOMEN'S CENTER TO COMPLY WITH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM REGARDING JANE DOE NO. 4 4. In her deposition, Jane Doe No. 4 testified that she had three abortions, at least two of which was performed at Presidential Women's Center. See 10/27/09 Deposition of Jane Doe No. 4 at 311-313, excerpt attached as Exhibit A. 5. On November 13, 2009, Epstein issued a subpoena (attached as Exhibit B) to Presidential Women's Center for records relating to Jane Doe No. 4. 6. Jane Doe No. 4 did not object to said subpoena. 7. Presidential Women's Center represented they will not produce records without a court order or a signed HIP AA release from the patient. 8. On December 18, 2009, counsel for Epstein requested Jane Doe No. 4 provide an executed release for Presidential Women's Center. To date, no release has been received. 9. Accordingly, Epstein requests the Court enter an order compelling Presidential Women's Center to comply with the November 13, 2009 subpoena duces tecum within five (5) days of the Court's order. 10. This discovery is obviously relevant and discoverable and, again, Jane Doe No. 4 (also represented by counsel for Jane Doe Nos. 2, 3 and 5-8) did not object to the subpoena. As the Court stated in its September 4, 2009 Order (DE #289), "[ u ]nder these circumstances, where Plaintiff is seeking to recover expenses associated with these complex medical issues, full knowledge of Plaintiffs past and present medical, psychological, familial and social histories is essential." See DE #289 at 4; see also DE #377 at 10 ("As a global matter, Plaintiffs clearly and 2 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 443 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/29/2009
Page 3 of 5 unequivocally place their sexual history in issue by their allegations that Epstein's actions in this case has negatively affected their relationships.... To deny Epstein this discovery [regarding past sexual history], would be tantamount to barring him from mounting a defense."). WHEREFORE, Epstein respectfully requests the Court enter an order compelling Presidential Women's Center to produce documents responsive to the subpoena duces tecum regarding Jane Doe No. 4 and attached to this Motion as Exhibit A within five (5) days of the Court's order and grant any additional relief the Court deems just and proper. Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 29th day of December, 2009 Respectfully submitted, By: s/ Michael J. Pike ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #6 I 7296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) Certificate of Service Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARIWJOHNSON Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard 3 Brad Edwards, Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 424 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite #2 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 443 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/29/2009
Page 4 of 5 Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel.for Plaint/Ifs In related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119, 08- 80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993, 08- 80994 Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 561-582-7600 Fax: 561-588-8819 Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80811 [email protected] Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 561-686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9424 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel.for Plaintiff, C.MA. Bruce Reinhart, Esq. Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 250 S. Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-202-6360 Fax: 561-828-0983 [email protected] Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen 4 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2833 [email protected] Counsel for Plaint/ff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. ProHac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax [email protected] Co-counsel.for Plaintiff Jane Doe Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-832-7732 561-832-7137 F [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 443 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/29/2009








