DOJ-COURT-389 is a motion filed by Jeffrey Epstein's counsel requesting permission to exceed the standard page limit for a legal response in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein.
The document is a legal motion filed on November 2, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Jeffrey Epstein, through his legal counsel, requests permission to submit a response exceeding 20 pages to Jane Doe 2-8's motion to compel net worth discovery, arguing that a longer response is necessary to adequately address the issues raised. The document also notes that the plaintiff's counsel has no objection to the request.
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 389 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/02/2009
Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. _______________ ,/ Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591,09-80656,09-80802,09-81092 ______________ __:! DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION IN RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO JANE DOES 2-8' MOTION TO COMPEL NET WORTH DISCOVERY, WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to exceed the page limitation of 20 pages imposed by Loe. Gen. Rule 7.1. C. 2. (S.D. Fla.), in his Response in Opposition to Jane Does 2-8s Motion to Compel Net Worth Discovery, with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (DE 333 and 333-1). In support of his motion, Defendant states: 1. This motion is being filed in an abundance of caution. 2. Local Gen. Rule 7.1 C. 2. provides in part that "absent prior permission of the court, no party shall file any legal memorandum exceeding twenty pages in length." 3. A length exceeding 20 pages is required so that Defendant may fully address the issues raised in Plaintiffs Motion to Compel which are directed to Defendant's Answers to Interrogatories and Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs Production Request. In order Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 389 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/02/2009
Page 2 of 4 to present Defendant's response in an organized and understandable manner, the 20 page limitation is required to be exceeded. WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that this Court grant Defendant's motion, and enter an order allowing a response, including memorandum of law, which is in excess of 20 pages by two (2) additional pages. Rule 7.1 Certification Pursuant to communication by telephone, Plaintiffs counsel has no objection to the request to exceed 20 pages herein. By: :::-:-:--::zt'-:7L:::-±--::-:::-::--- MICHA . PI , ESQ. Florida ar NO. 6 7296 ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing wa el ctronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that t,J<v,'""'"g,oing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on th Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this ,;Z. day of 2009 By:-=±z~l.:-::=--:--:::----::-:- ROBER . CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 389 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/02/2009
Page 3 of 4 BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/253-0164 Fax (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) Certificate of Service Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiffs In related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-801]9, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993, 08-80994 Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 561-582-7600 Fax: 561-588-8819 Counsel for Plaint/ff in Related Case No. 08-80811 [email protected] Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 40 I East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 3 3 3 0 I Phone: 954-522-3456 Fax: 954-527-8663 [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax [email protected] Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-832-7732 561-832-7137 F [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 389 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/02/2009








