UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant _____________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant ______________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant _______________________________/ Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 209 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2009

Page 1 of 7 2 JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant _____________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 6. CASE NO: 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant _______________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO: 08-CV-80993-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant ________________________________/ Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 209 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2009

Page 2 of 7 3 CASE NO: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M.A., Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant ______________________________/ JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. ______________________________/ DOE II, CASE NO: 09-CV-80469-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendants. _______________________________/ Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 209 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2009

Page 3 of 7 4 JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO: 09-CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant ______________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO: 09-CV-80656-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant _______________________________/ PLAINTIFF, JANE DOE’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION IN HER REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO JANE DOE’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTION RESTRAINING FRAUDULENT TRANSFER OF ASSETS Plaintiff, Jane Doe, hereby moves to exceed the page limitation of 10 pages for a reply memorandum of law found in Local Rule 7.1C.2. Jane Doe is preparing a reply to Defendant’s opposition to her motion for an injunction restraining fraudulent transfer of assets. Local Rule 7.1.C.2. provides that “[a]bsent prior permission of the court” a reply memorandum of law may not exceed 10 pages in length. It is clear that, given the many issues raised by defendant’s opposition to Plaintiff’s motion (which opposition is itself 24 pages long) that more than 10 pages Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 209 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2009

Page 4 of 7 5 will be required to fully and adequately respond to and discuss the issues raised. Moreover, the issues raised are quite complicated, as they go to questions surrounding how the court should respond to fraudulent transfers of substantial assets to overseas locations by defendant Jeffrey Epstein, a billionaire. In addition, substantial financial assets are at stake; Jane Doe has moved, for example, for a receiver to take control of Defendant’s assets to permit the posting of a $15 million bond. As certified below, Defendant’s counsel have agreed to the request to exceed 10 pages. WHEREFORE, Jane Doe respectfully requests that this Court grant her motion and enter an order allowing a reply in excess of 10 pages. Local Rule 7.1 statement Counsel for movant Jane Doe have conferred with counsel for the defendant, and counsel for Defendant kindly agreed to the requested filing in excess of ten pages. DATED July 20, 2009 Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 522-3456 Facsimile (954) 527-8663 Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: [email protected] and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 209 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2009

Page 5 of 7 6 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: [email protected] CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 20, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically filed Notices of Electronic Filing. s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 209 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2009

Page 6 of 7 7 SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Isidro Manual Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz [email protected] Stuart S. Mermelstein [email protected] William J. Berger [email protected] Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 209 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2009