Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 102 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2009

Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. _________ __,! JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, vs. IBFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. __________ ! JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. _________ __,! CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 102 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2009

Page 2 of 5 JANE DOE NO. 5, Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. __________ _,/ JANE DOE NO. 6, Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 7, Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ' Defendant. C.M.A., Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. I I CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 102 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2009

Page 3 of 5 JANEDOE, CASE NO.: 08-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants. I DOE II, CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA-JOHNSON Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants. I JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09-80591-CIV-MARRA-JOHNSON Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. I JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO.: 09-80656-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. I DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' .JANE DOE 2 -7 RESPONSES IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO 1st SET OF INTERROGATORIES ANDI st REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 102 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2009

Page 4 of 5 Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein") by and through his undersigned attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which to reply to Plaintiffs' Responses In Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories And Production of Documents, dated March 2, 2009. Local General Rule 7.1 A.1 and Rule 6, Fed. R. Civ. P. (2009). Defendant seeks an extension until May 22, 2009, to file his response. As good cause in support of granting the motion, Defendant states: l. Defendant's rep! y to the Plaintiff's Responses in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to compel would be due on May 18, 2009. As certified below, Plaintiff's counsel is in agreement with the requested extension of May 20, 2009. 2. Plaintiff's counsel also represents five other Plaintiffs pursuing claims against Defendant, EPSTEIN. A total of five of the Plaintiffs have also filed Responses In Opposition to Defendant's Motions to Compel bearing the same dates. In order to fully and adequately respond to this and the other motions, Defendant is in need of an extension until May 20, 2009. 3. The requested extension is fair in reasonable under the circumstances as it will provide time to allow the Defendant, EPSTEIN, to fully and adequately reply to this and the other Responses in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel. WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court enter an order granting the Defendant an extension until May 20, 2009, in which to respond to Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of documents. Local Rule 7 .1 Certification Counsel for the movant conferred by telephone with counsel for the Plaintiff and Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 102 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2009