DOJ-DOE6-80994-096
Document DOJ-DOE6-80994-096 is a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in 2010.
The document pertains to the case of Jane Doe No. 6 against Jeffrey Epstein. It indicates that both parties, Jane Doe No. 6 and Jeffrey Epstein, have agreed to dismiss the action with prejudice, meaning it cannot be brought again. The stipulation also states that each party will bear their own attorney's fees and costs, and the court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement terms.
Key Highlights
- •The document is a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice in the case of Jane Doe No. 6 v. Jeffrey Epstein.
- •Both Jeffrey Epstein and Jane Doe No. 6 agreed to the dismissal.
- •The law firms of Mermelstein & Horowitz and CRITTON,LUTTIER & COLEMAN are mentioned as representing Jane Doe No. 6 and Jeffrey Epstein respectively.
Frequently Asked Questions
Books for Further Reading
Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open
Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network
Best witness: The Mel Mermelstein affair and the triumph of historical revisionism
Document Information
Bates Range
DOJ-DOE6-80994-096
Pages
2
Source
DOJ First Production
Original Filename
096.pdf
Document Content
Page 1 - DOJ-DOE6-80994-096_p1
Case 9:08-cv-80994-KAM Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2010
Page 2 - DOJ-DOE6-80994-096_p2
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 6 Plaintiff, V. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ------------~' STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff, JANE DOE NO. 6 and Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (collectively, "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 41 (A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own attorneys fees and costs. The Parties further stipulate that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties' settlement. Dated this %,(//day of June, 2010 BURMAN, CRI TON UTTIER & COLEMAN, Attorneys f By:-=±±-c-r--:c=-t=,,-,-,-,-,..,,.--,,,-,--- RO N, JR., ESQ. Flor 162 rcrit Respectfully submitted, MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Jane Doe No. 6 By:~~ ADA D.HOROWIT , Q. Florida Bar N~. [email protected] 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Case 9:08-cv-80994-KAM Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2010
Entities Mentioned
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSON
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON • 2 mentions
Family name
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON
2001 album by Converge
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON • 3 mentions
American sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
MP
Michael J. Pike
PERSON
RC
Robert D. Critton
PERSON • 2 mentions
SM
Stuart S. Mermelstein
PERSON
Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman LLP
ORGANIZATION
Mermelstein & Horowitz
ORGANIZATION
Statistics
Pages:2
Entities:9
Sponsored