Document DOJ-COURT-089 is a motion filed by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys requesting an extension of time to reply to a response in opposition to a motion to stay a complaint in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein.
This legal document, filed in the Southern District of Florida, shows Jeffrey Epstein seeking a time extension until May 20, 2009, to prepare a reply in the case brought by Jane Doe No. 2. The reasons cited for the extension include involvement in other cases involving Epstein and preparation for a state court trial. The document highlights the legal maneuvering and complexities surrounding the cases involving Jeffrey Epstein.

Perversion of Justice
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the case open

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2009
Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, V. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ----------------'' DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein") by and through his undersigned attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which to file his Reply to Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay Complaint. 1. On April 23, 2009 Plaintiff filed a Response [DE 82] in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay [DE 65]. Defendant's reply would be due on May 5, 2009 (5 days to reply excluding weekends + mailing). Defendant is requesting a fifteen (15) day extension to May 20, 2009 to reply. 2. There are several other cases filed with this Court in which Jeffrey Epstein is named a Defendant. In those cases, the undersigned has been handling other matters associated therewith. 3. Additionally, Defendant's counsel is in the midst of preparing for a state court trial, CARDIOPULMONARY & PRIMARY CARE ASSOC. OF TREASURE COAST, P.A v. LEWIS, M.D., Case No. 562008CA001726, specially set for trial beginning May 13 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2009
Page 2 of 3 Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Page 2 through 15, 2009). Discovery in that case is ongoing with several depositions set to prepare for trial. 4. The requested extension is fair and reasonable under the circumstances as it will provide time to allow the Defendant, EPSTEIN, to fully and adequately reply. 5. An extension until May 20, 2009, is fair and reasonable under the circumstances. The undersigned is in need of the additional time in order to fully and adequately prepare a response on behalf of EPSTEIN. 6. As certified below, counsel for Defendant conferred with counsel by e-mail, and Plaintiff's counsel is in agreement with the requested extension. WHEREFORE Defendant respectfully requests that this Court enter an order granting an extension until May 20, 2009, to file a Reply to Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay Complaint. Local Rule 7.1 Statement Counsel for the movant conferred by e-mail with counsel for the Plaintiff and Counsel for Plaintiff is in agreement with the requested extension until May 20, 2009 for Defendant to reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defend irnt's Motion to Stay Complaint. Rob C It ~n, Jr. Attorney for Defendant Epstein Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this~ day of May . 2009: Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2009

