Epstein Secrets

482, the government need not "identify a specific decision" made by the agency to establish the predecisional nature of a particular record. NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck,421 U.S. 132, 151 n.18 (1975); accord Tigue v. U.S. Dep't ofJustice, 312 F.3d 70, 80 (2d Cir. 2002). Rather, so long as the document "was

ional' and `deliberative."' Grand Cent P 'ship v. Cuomo,166 F.3d 473, 482 (2d Cir. 1999) (quoting Renego

which governmental decisions and policies are formulated." Dep't of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n, 532 U.S. I, 8 (2001) (quoting Sears, 421 U.S. at 150). But the records withheld are largely not akin to advisory opinions or policy recommendations and do not relate to any policymakin

134482 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 2020) 9 iii EFTA00071626 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 27 Filed 09/10/20 Page 4 of 29 Grand Central p'ship, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473 (2d Cir. 1999) 18, 19 Gray v. United States Anny Crim. Investigation Command, 742 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D.D.C. 2010) 9 Hopkins v. U.S.

which governmental decisions and policies are formulated." Dep't of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n, 532 U.S. I, 8 (2001) (quoting Sears, 421 U.S. at 150). But the records withheld are largely not akin to advisory opinions or policy recommendations and do not relate to any policymakin

134482 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 2020) 9 iii EFTA00088703 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 27 Filed 09/10/20 Page 4 of 29 Grand Central p'ship, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473 (2d Cir. 1999) 18, 19 Gray v. United States Anny Crim. Investigation Command, 742 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D.D.C. 2010) 9 Hopkins v. U.S.