Epstein Secrets

rald LaPorte • • Dr. Elizabeth Loftus • John Lopez • EFTA00040232 Page 3 • • Pat McHugh • •

h Loftus • John Lopez • EFTA00040232 Page 3 • • Pat McHugh • • • Jennifer Naso • • a • • David Rodgers • Alfredo Rodriguez • Dr. Lisa Rocchio • Lawrence Visoski • Les Wexner • II. List of Places The following is a list of places that may be discussed at trial: • 358 El Brillo Way,

that there are in fact two distinct conspiracies and that the defendant is not being placed in jeopardy twice for the same crime." United States v. Lopez, 356 F.3d 463, 467 (2d Cir. 2004) (per curiam) (citing United States v. Del Vecchio, 800 F.2d 21, 22 (2d Cir. 1986)); see also United States v. Mal

d facilitated the sexual abuse of minor victims was a central focus of both parties' cases at trial. The Government called as an expert witness Dr. Lisa Rocchio, who identified the typical steps in sexual abusers' grooming of 10 EFTA00156409 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 657 Filed 04/29/22 Page 11 of 45

er ability to perceive or to recall events or to testify accurately." Vitale, 459 F.3d at 196 (quoting Sasso, 59 F.3d at 348); see United States v. Lopez, 611 F.2d 44,45 (4th Cir. 1979) ("[M]any psychiatric problems ... which a witness may have had are without any relevancy to the witness' credibility

f those experts, Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, are expected to offer opinions that rebut opinions of the Government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio. The Government on November 8, 2021, filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Dkt. No. 424. The Court has al

er ability to perceive or to recall events or to testify accurately." Vitale, 459 F.3d at 196 (quoting Sasso, 59 F.3d at 348); see United States v. Lopez, 611 F.2d 44,45 (4th Cir. 1979) ("[M]any psychiatric problems ... which a witness may have had are without any relevancy to the witness' credibility

f those experts, Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, are expected to offer opinions that rebut opinions of the Government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio. The Government on November 8, 2021, filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Dkt. No. 424. The Court has al

er ability to perceive or to recall events or to testify accurately." Vitale, 459 F.3d at 196 (quoting Sasso, 59 F.3d at 348); see United States v. Lopez, 611 F.2d 44, 45 (4th Cir. 1979) ("[M]any psychiatric problems ... which a witness may have had are without any relevancy to the witness' credibilit

f those experts, Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, are expected to offer opinions that rebut opinions of the Government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio. The Government on November 8, 2021, filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Dkt. No. 424. The Court has al