3
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
3 / 4
Mentions
ARTICLE: Treating Crime Victims Fairly: Integrating Victims into the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
dopted amendments to their own state constitutions, | which protect a wide range of victims’ rights. ® Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808, 834 (1991) (Scalia, J., concurring) (internal quotations omitted). See generally Douglas E. Beloof, Paul G. Cassell & Steven J. Twist, Victims in Criminal Procedure 638
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017638 →lose the identity of its witnesses before trial. However, the basis for such grants of authority now seems defunct. For instance, in United States v. Armstrong, the Ninth Circuit recognized no authority exists in the federal rules for requiring the government to disclose the names of its witnesses. 74 Still,
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017676 →disclosure of witness names before trial appears inconsistent with the federal rules. And even if the Ninth Circuit's approach was valid at the time Armstrong was decided, such an approach is no longer valid in light of the CVRA. Rule 57(b) only provides a basis for court authority in the absence of control
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017676 →Article: Criminal Enforcement Redundancy: Oversight of Decisions Not to Prosecute
97 U.S. 358, 364 (1970) (holding that proof beyond a reasonable doubt is constitutionally required under the Due Process Clause). ° United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 456-71 (1996) (examining selective prosecution claim based on racial bias); see also Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 813 (1996)
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016511 →ivate benefits that criminal justice is now widely recognized to afford, and owe, to victims. 27 See Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654, 727-28 (1988) (Scalia, J., dissenting) ("Law enforcement is not automatic ... . What every prosecutor is practically required to do is to select the cases for prosecution
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016515 →ARTICLE: Recognizing Victims in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: Proposed Amendments in Light of the Crime Victims' Rights Act
nial Revolution in Criminal Justice: The Return of the Victim, 13 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 649, 650 (1976). 5 Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808, 834 (1991) (Scalia, J., concurring) (internal quotation marks omitted). See generally Douglas Evan Beloof, Paul G. Cassell & Steve J. Twist, Victims in Criminal Procedu
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017717 →246 150 Cong. Rec. $10,911 (daily ed. Oct. 9, 2004) (statement of Sen. Kyl) (emphases added). 247 Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 80 (1972) (quoting Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545, 552 (1965)). 248 150 Cong. Rec. $4264 (daily ed. Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Kyl) (emphasis added). 249 See 18 U.S.C.
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017750 →Entities connected to both Antonin Scalia and Armstrong

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
George W. Bush
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONLeon Black
PERSON
Barack Obama
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSONEmmy Taylor
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Paul Ryan
PERSON
Michael Jackson
PERSON
John F. Kennedy
PERSON