Epstein Secrets

ficult to obtain (Shuman, Cunningham. Connell, & Reid. 2003). It is therefore recom- mended that the fo

in 2010 and 2017 (American Psychological Association [APA). 2017). While the APA Ethics Code applies to all psychology special- ty areas, including Forensic Psychology (Bush. Connell, & Denney, 2020). certain sections of the code may be relevant for forensic practice, generally. and forensic assessment in- volving

he CIS certainly is warranted. A second limitation with the present experiment is that the design did not include a comparison procedure such as the Reid confrontation interrogation technique (21). Now that the CIS has shown promise as an alternative procedure, such comparisons in future exper- iments

Defense Intelli- Copyright 2012 American Journal of Forensic Psychology, Volume 30. Issue 3. The Journal is a publication of the American College of Forensic Psychology, PO Box 130458, Carlsbad, California 92013. EFTA01657001 2 / OBSELMAN: THE COONMVE INTERVIEW FOR SUSPECTS gence Agency, UK Home Office, Calgary P

ing victims and witnesses of crime (National Institute of Justice - Geiselman & Fisher, 1985). The most notable police procedure at the time was the Reid and Associates confrontational interrogation technique for use with suspects (Inbau, Reid, Buckley, & Jayne, 2001), not for use with witnesses and

ecall. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 28, 65-69. Geiselman, R.E. (2012). The cognitive interview for suspects (CIS). American College of Forensic Psychology, al, 1-16. Geiselman, R.E. & Callot, R. (1990). Reverse and forward order recall of script-based text. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology 4, 1