Epstein Secrets

and for what purpose. Bryon. Hatless. Schaffer. Reid & Assocs.. Inc. v. State ex rel. Schellenberg. 36

d in the Court's Orders (DE 242, p.4 and 462, p.2). As this Court knows, Epstein entered into a Non- Prosecution Agreement ("NPA") with the USAO for the Federal Southern District of Florida . However, the NPA does not provide Epstein with any protection from criminal investigation or prosecution other than in the Southern Di

and for what purpose. Bryon. Harless, Schaffer, Reid & Assocs., Inc. v. State ex rel, Schellenberq, 3

its criminal prosecution against EPSTEIN. EPSTEIN entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement ("NPA") with United States Attorney General's Office for the Federal Southern District of Florida. The terms and conditions of the NPA also entailed EPSTEIN entering into a Plea Agreement with the State Attorney's Office, Palm Beach C

m, and for what purpose. Bryon, Hades& Schaffer, Reid & Assocs., Inc. v. State ex rel. Schellenberg, 36

cknowledged in the Court's Orders (DE 242 and 462). As this Court knows, Epstein entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement ("NPA") with the USAO for the Federal Southern District of Florida. However, the NPA does not provide Epstein with gni protection from criminal investigation or prosecution in other than in the Southern