Epstein Secrets

U.S.D.J. cc: A ey; Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.; Reid Weingarten, Esq.; David Boies, Esq. 2 EFTA00086

ualification from representing Ms.. Lirint(in a case obviously related to US v. Epstein) was not disclosed simultaneously with your August 26, 2019 Law Journal opinion piece entitled "The Judge in Epstein's Case Should Not Turn the Dismissal Into a Drama for the Victims." I am also surprised that you would

." Sincerely, Richard M. Berman U.S.D.J. cc: Reid Weingarten, Esq.; David Boies, Esq. 2 EFTA00098

Boles' disqualification from representing (in a case obviously related to US v. Epstein) was not disclosed simultaneously with your August 26, 2019 Law Journal opinion piece entitled "The Judge in Epstein's Case Should Not Turn the Dismissal Into a Drama for the Victims." I am also surprised that you would

alification from representing Ms. Guiffre (in a case obviously related to US v. Epstein) was not disclosed simultaneously with your August 26, 2019 Law Journal opinion piece entitled "The Judge in Epstein's Case Should Not Tum the Dismissal Into a Drama for the Victims." I am also surprised that you would f

an U.S.D.J. cc: AU Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.; Reid Weingarten, Esq.; David Boies, Esq. 2 EFTA00011

NYPD. MR. WEINGARTEN: Good morning, your Honor. Reid Weingarten. MR. WEINBERG: Martin Weinberg. Good

ised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal. But in any event, I think you know where I'm heading. I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal piece. I was saying that the government's motion is relatively straightforward, and in my view, a public hearing is clearly, nevertheless, the pre