Epstein Secrets

ner, L., Briere, J., Hendrix, C.T., Jenny, C., & Reid, T.A. (Eds.), APSAC hand- book on child maltreatm

oca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Myers, J.E.B., & Stern, P. (2002). Expert testimony. In Myers, J.S.B., Berliner, L., Briere, J., Hendrix, C.T., Jenny C., & Reid, T.A. (Eds.), APSAC handbook on child maltreatment (2nd ed) (pp. 379402). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Saywitz, K.J., Goodman, G.S., & Lyon, T.D. (2002

591. Dietz, P.E. (1983). Sex offenses: Behavioral aspects. In S.H. Kadish et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of crime and justice. New York: Free Press. Feldman, M.D, & Ford, C.V. (1994). Patient or pretender. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Hartman, C.R., Burgess, A.W., & Lanning, K.V. (1984). Typology of

and for what purpose. Bryon, Harless, Schaffer, Reid & Assocs., Inc. v. State ex rel, Schellenberg, 3

. shall be compelled in any Criminal Case to be a witness against himself." Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479,486, 71 S.Ct. 814 (1951), citing Feldman v. United States, 1944, 322 U.S. 487, 489, 64 S.Ct. 1082, 1083, 88 L.Ed. 1408." The Fifth Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination is "acco

and for what purpose. Bryon. Harless, Schaffer, Reid & Assocs., Inc. v. State ex rel, Schellenberq, 3

. shall be compelled in any Criminal Case to be a witness against himself." Hoffman v. United States 341 U.S. 479, 486, 71 S.Ct. 814 (1951), citing Feldman v. United States 1944, 322 U.S. 487, 489, 64 S.Ct. 1082, 1083, 88 L.Ed. 1408." The Fifth Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination is "accor

00490-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19 Page 1 of 16 Reid Weingarten 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York

d in part by the Non-Prosecution Agreement — such judicial action might raise additional questions about this Court's jurisdiction under the Rooker/Feldman doctrine. See, e.g., Casale v. Tillman, 558 F.3d 1258, 1260-61 (11th Cir. 2009); Powell v. Powell, 80 F.3d 464, 466-68 (11th Cir. 1996). 4 EFTA000

00490-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19 Page 1 of 16 Reid Weingarten July 11, 2019 VIA ECF The Honorable

d in part by the Non-Prosecution Agreement — such judicial action might raise additional questions about this Court's jurisdiction under the Rooker/Feldman doctrine. See, e.g., Casale v. Tillman, 558 F.3d 1258, 1260-61 (11th Cir. 2009); Powell v. Powell, 80 F.3d 464, 466-68 (11th Cir. 1996). 4 EFTA000